By JUAN O. TAMAYO
Herald Staff Writer
The Clinton administration's campaign to promote people-to-people contacts
with
Cuba, including the Baltimore Orioles' controversial game in Havana this
weekend,
appears to be rattling President Fidel Castro's defensive strategies.
``Relations with the United States are at one of the most complex and
sophisticated points in years, one Cuban government official said. ``Things
are no
longer black and white. Now we have more shadows.
Those shadows were cast by a series of Clinton administration actions that
include
the decision to allow the Orioles to play an exhibition game in Havana
on Sunday.
The aim of the policy measures is to isolate Castro and push him to halt
human
rights abuses and embrace economic reforms even as individuals on both
sides of
the Florida Straits reach out to each other.
Critics on both sides
Two batches of such measures announced Jan. 5 and in March 1998 were flayed
by critics of the U.S. embargo as too feeble and by conservatives as part
of a
veiled Clinton plot to slowly lift all U.S. sanctions on Cuba.
The Orioles game against a Cuban team, the first Major League Baseball
visit to
Havana since 1959, turned especially thorny after a Cuban court convicted
the
island's four top opposition leaders of sedition last week.
``This is no time to play ball with Fidel Castro, a Houston Chronicle editorial
said.
The three Cuban Americans in the U.S. Congress and one dissident on the
island,
among others, demanded that the game be canceled.
But Washington has hung tough, with Secretary of State Madeleine Albright
managing so far to forestall attacks from key players such as Senate Foreign
Affairs Committee Chairman Jesse Helms, R-N.C.
Trial cited as example
The trial of the four dissidents was ``exactly why we must continue
people-to-people contacts, because the regime cannot stand up to the increasing
flow of information from the outside world, one State Department official
said.
The Orioles game ``conveys the message that the American people bear the
Cuban people no ill will, the official added. ``We want Cuban people to
be
exposed to democratic values. Sports contacts . . . will do that.
That argument leaves some critics unconvinced. ``The game is not political?
You
mean Fidel Castro will not be at the stadium? said Frank Calzon, head of
the
Washington-based Center for a Free Cuba.
The 200 people on the Orioles' plane to Cuba, and the hundreds of journalists
who will cover the game, Calzon added, ``will make this a media circus
at a time
when Cuba is violating every human right known to man.
Others say the only shortcomings of the Jan. 5 and March 1998 measures
is that
they do not go far enough in permitting contacts between the United States
and
Cuba.
``If the goal is to foster a more open society in Cuba, it doesn't make
sense to
have a policy that closes off commerce and travel, said Phil Peters, a
senior fellow
at the Alexis de Tocqueville Institution, a Virginia think tank.
Cuba's perspective
But while the argument over the Clinton measures rages in the United States,
Cuban officials have been complaining that those measures are indeed proving
disturbing to the island's communist regime.
National Assembly chief Ricardo Alarcon complained last week that while
some
Americans might view the Clinton measures as a ``flexibilization of the
U.S.
embargo, Cuba regarded them as an ``intensification of the 40-year-old
confrontation across the Florida Straits.
Alarcon told the Communist Party's Granma newspaper that U.S. policy toward
Cuba was in fact still dominated by the Helms-Burton legislation adopted
in 1996
and ``only tightened again and again in the nearly three years since.
The Jan. 5 measures, he added, were especially ``aggressive because they
allow
Cuban Americans and U.S. citizens to send financial aid to dissidents whom
the
government considers to be ``counterrevolutionaries.''
One Cuban official went even further in a recent series of conversations
with
foreign journalists, arguing that the Clinton strategy of promoting
``people-to-people contacts was throwing Havana off balance.
Concern about image
``When you come at me with a saber in your hand, I have to defend myself
any
way I can. But when you put away that saber and try to embrace me, you
put me
in a difficult situation, said the official, who asked for anonymity because
he was
speaking more frankly than his government might wish.
``I know that what you have in mind is this sort of `deadly embrace,' but
imagine
what the world would think if I pushed you away, the official added. ``We
know
the U.S. aims, but the world would see us as paranoid.
Castro's concern over this new U.S. approach may be part of the explanation
for
his drive to have the Cuban legislature adopt a harsh new law against dissent
in
January, the official speculated.
Cuba must now decide how it will handle these seemingly softened but in
fact
more threatening Clinton initiatives, one foreigner living in Havana said
later: reject
the contacts altogether, or take some risks.
``Miami is worried because of the propaganda value the Orioles game here
might
have, he said. ``Imagine the worry here about defections when the Cuban
team
goes to Baltimore for a game in May.
Copyright © 1999 The Miami Herald