The migratory issue as a weapon against Cuba. Pretext for aggression
BY ARSENIO RODRÍGUEZ—Granma daily staff writer—
THE recent round of migratory talks between Cuba and the United States
was characterized by the scrupulous fulfillment of those agreements by
the Cuban side and increasing U.S. violations of them. The latter country
refused to go into that aspect as the Cubans wished, thus confirming that
the migratory issue is still being utilized as a weapon against the Cuban
Revolution.
The Cuban delegation went to New York with seven important issues for
discussion. Those were: the illegal radio transmissions in violation of
the
accords; the weak response there to hijackings of Cuban vessels and
aircraft (seven in the recent months), characterized by the tolerance of
the U.S. authorities; the trafficking of immigrants, over which a similar
attitude is maintained; the dramatic reduction in the number of annual
visas; and the reiteration by the Cuban side of joint proposals to combat
terrorism, drug trafficking and human contraband.
There was also the issue of the reduction in temporary visas for entry
into
the United States, made evident by the repeated refusal to grant them to
Olga and Adriana, the wives of René and Gerardo, two of the five
Cuban
patriots imprisoned in that country, with the fabricated argument of
protecting "U.S. security."
However, the principal issue was the continued application of the Cuban
Adjustment Act and the "dry foot, wet foot" policy, which constitutes the
greatest violation of all the migratory agreements.
During the review of this issue certain aspects were highlighted that could
be of interest to the United States, like its border defense, as the
haphazard acceptation of Cubans émigrés without any concern
over their
means of entry into that territory is not coherent with its national security
policy. This was even posed recently by George W. Bush, who
acknowledged the double standard of his government’s migratory policy.
It was noted that 13% of persons intercepted at sea are accepted by the
United States, which constitutes a further violation of the migratory
agreements.
The U.S. position in the face of all that was confined to the response
that
the delegation had no mandate to discuss U.S. law, thus evidencing the
lack of interest in approaching the issue seriously.
The TV roundtable information program on the latest round of talks had
the participation of Rafael Dausá, Northern American head of the
Ministry
of Foreign Affairs (MINREX), who led the Cuban delegation; and Caridad
Pérez, a MINREX official; as well as journalists Lázaro Barredo,
Rogelio
Polanco and Reinaldo Taladrid, with Randy Alonso as usual acting as
moderator.
The issue of illegal radio transmissions was logically raised at the talks
by
Cuba in the light of the recent actions on May 20 presaging a new scale
in
the U.S. radio-electronic warfare against the island, which that country
has engaged in since the very triumph of the Revolution.
The delegation likewise brought up vessel and aircraft hijackings and
reiterated Cuba’s firm position in that context, while criticizing the
way in
which the U.S. authorities present the authors of those acts of terrorism
as freedom fighters and even grant them bail.
In terms of visas requested for Cubans to participate in academic and
cultural events and activities in the United States, there has been a
reduction this year in comparison with 2002, whether by refusing to grant
them or not granting them in time, thus evidencing an interest in reducing
the exchange of cultural and educational activities between the two
nations.
The roundtable discussion once again demonstrated the exposé by
the
Cuban authorities that the United States is persisting in utilizing the
migratory issue as a political weapon with the aim of provoking a crisis
to
justify a potential aggression against the island.