House GOP Negotiates on Trade Sanctions
By Eric Pianin
Washington Post Staff Writer
House Republicans, sharply divided over a proposal to ease economic
sanctions against rogue countries, yesterday began discussing a possible
compromise that would deny communist Cuba any of the benefits.
Proponents of improved trade relations in both the House and Senate
succeeded last week in attaching amendments to agriculture spending bills
lifting sanctions on the sale of food and drugs to Cuba, Iran, Sudan, Libya
and North Korea. The push is being fueled by farm-state Republicans
seeking new overseas markets for constituents.
But House and Senate GOP leaders are vigorously opposed to any
measure that would alter the 40-year-old sanctions on Cuba.
Rep. George R. Nethercutt (R-Wash.), a leader of the drive to end the
sanctions, said he is considering a number of compromises that would
carve Cuba out of the measure. "Maybe there's a middle ground," he said.
Nethercutt and House GOP leaders have also discussed removing the
trade measure from the appropriations bill, stripping it of the Cuba
language and attaching the prohibition against future food and medicine
embargoes to a popular crop insurance bill nearing final action in Congress.
GOP leaders say easing sanctions against Cuba would only strengthen the
hand of the Castro dictatorship. Proponents have argued that sanctions
harm innocent people and deny U.S. farmers new markets.
The impasse has jeopardized swift passage of the 2001 agriculture
spending bill, but yesterday House Appropriations Committee Chairman
C.W. Bill Young (R-Fla.) said a compromise could be worked out before
the end of the week.