Senate Votes to Lift an Embargo on Cuba
Measure to End Most Unilateral Export Bans Would Allow Food, Medicine Sales
By Thomas W. Lippman
Washington Post Staff Writer
The economic distress of the nation's farmers trumped 30 years of foreign
policy ideology this week as the Senate voted to lift the U.S. embargo
on
the sale of food and medicine to Cuba.
Farm-state senators from both parties rallied to support an amendment to
the $68 billion agriculture spending bill that would lift most unilateral
U.S.
embargoes on the export of food and medicine to Cuba and other
countries. It also would prohibit the president from imposing such bans
in
the future without the consent of Congress.
If enacted, the measure would sharply curtail use of a standard weapon
in
the foreign policy arsenal, the denial of access to U.S. agricultural bounty,
medicine and medical technology. The House version of the spending bill
contains no similar provision, so the outcome will be determined by a
House-Senate conference.
"This is a major shift in national policy and an important gain for farmers
in
Missouri and the rest of the country," said the measure's sponsor, Sen.
John D. Ashcroft (R-Mo.). "At a time of drought and financial hardship
from low prices, this will protect farmers from being used as pawns of
diplomacy."
According to Philip Peters, an analyst of Latin American affairs at the
Lexington Institute, a Washington think tank, this is the first time that
either
house of Congress has voted to ease trade sanctions on Cuba since 1992,
when Congress allowed resumption of normal payments for international
telephone calls to the island. In effect, Peters added, the Senate has
"almost completely dismantled the Cuba food and medicine embargo."
Americans for Humanitarian Trade With Cuba, a coalition of business,
religious and legal organizations that has opposed the ban on food and
medicine sales to Cuba, hailed the Senate action as "a milestone victory."
The group's executive director, Sylvia Wilhelm, a Cuban American, said
in
a statement that "the Cuban people want and need food and medicine from
the U.S. and will applaud this important development."
The debate in the Senate, however, was not centered on Cuba. It was
about declining U.S. farm exports worldwide and the desire of agricultural
groups to eliminate unilateral food export bans. The Ashcroft amendment
does not even mention Cuba specifically--it eliminates unilateral export
bans, and thus would also apply to North Korea and other countries listed
by the State Department as sponsors of international terrorism.
It would not apply to Iraq or other countries to which sales are restricted
by United Nations sanctions.
The Senate passed the farm spending bill by voice vote. In the only
recorded vote on the Ashcroft amendment, a move to table it was
defeated, 70 to 28.
A Clinton administration spokesman said the White House "is prepared to
work with Congress" on crafting the final wording of the bill. Earlier
this
year, President Clinton modified the Cuba trade embargo to authorize
limited sales of food and fertilizer to independent, non-governmental
organizations in Cuba.
Advocates of ending the embargo on Cuba said the president's decision
has had little if any effect because the only food industry entities in
Cuba
not controlled by President Fidel Castro's Communist government are
small family-owned restaurants with no purchasing power.
The Ashcroft amendment would still require Treasury Department export
licenses for sales to countries on the terrorism list, but exporters could
obtain general licenses for a year at a time, rather than having to seek
a
separate license for each transaction.