By Joseph A. Manero
Wednesday, March 24, 1999; Page A27
Major League Baseball Commissioner Bud Selig and the Clinton
administration have apparently bought into the misguided notion that
constructive engagement with Fidel Castro will bring the United States
and
Cuba closer together. Their collective endorsement of the Baltimore
Orioles' trip to Havana this week to play the Cuban national team comes
at
a time when Castro has intensified efforts at crushing opposition to his
four-decades-old communist dictatorship.
As a Cuban American, I originally favored the Orioles' trip. Not because
of some pie-in-the-sky "Baseball Diplomacy" with the Castro regime, but
because I had hoped the trip would attract hordes of international media,
which would report not just on the familiar runs, hits and errors of the
baseball game but also on the plight of Cuban dissidents. In fact, I had
even considered going to Havana myself to witness the historic event and
to visit family members I hadn't seen in 27 years.
The recent trial and conviction of four dissidents there has served as
a rude
awakening, however, and has caused me to change my mind. Playing the
game sends the wrong message to Castro.
President Clinton called for the dissidents' immediate release and said
he
was "deeply disappointed" at the sentencing of "courageous" human rights
activists.
"They did nothing more than assert their right to speak freely about their
country's future, call on their government to respect basic human rights
and
seek a peaceful transition to democracy for the long-suffering Cuban
people," the president said.
Clinton should act quickly to cancel the exhibition game in Havana as well
as the scheduled return game at Baltimore's Camden Yards on May 3.
The convictions of the four Cubans provide a chilling illustration of
communist Cuba's lack of tolerance. In what may seem a surreal episode
of the Cold War, the dissidents were sentenced to prison for the crime
of
sedition. Translation: They attempted to stir up unrest among the Cuban
people by doing what you and I are doing here: exercising the basic right
of
free speech.
They openly questioned the communist government, drafted articles for
Cubans to read and disseminate and held news conferences with foreign
journalists. They did what we as Americans often take for granted. And
while we may raise an eyebrow or two if we call a radio talk show or send
an angry letter to a newspaper editor, we never think for a moment that
we
may be endangering our lives.
Unfortunately, the dissidents -- Marta Beatriz Roque, Vladimiro Roca,
Felix Bonne and Rene Gomez Manzano -- did just that. They refused the
Cuban government's offer of exile. Instead, they opted to remain in Cuba
in prison. Roca, a former military pilot, was sentenced to five years.
Manzano, a lawyer, and engineer Bonne got four years each, and
economist Roque received a three-year term.
Though the charges, trial and punishment of the four may seem surreal,
the
events constitute an all-too-real reminder of the lengths to which Castro's
regime is willing to go in the name of repression and control. It has become
clear that Castro does not seem to care about a possible rebuke by the
international community. In fact, he seems to relish rebuke; the convictions
could even be interpreted as Castro thumbing his nose at international
condemnation.
The dissidents were tried behind closed doors by a five-member
communist party tribunal. No foreign journalists were permitted to view
the
trial, a move questioned by many around the world, including U.S.
Secretary of State Madeline Albright.
As Albright pointed out, one of the basic elements of due process -- the
right of the accused to a public trial -- was trampled upon. The trial
"violated the very concept of the rule of law," Albright said.
The four had been held for 19 months awaiting trial.
Even Canada, one of Cuba's strongest defenders, is starting to wake up
to
the fact that Castro is unwilling to change his ways. Prime Minister Jean
Chretien, who pleaded the case of the four dissidents during a 1998 visit
with Castro, said the sentences would cause Canada to "review the range
of bilateral relations" with Cuba.
While Selig has gone to painstaking lengths to avoid any hint of a
connection between the Orioles' game in Havana and a possible shift in
U.S. policy toward Cuba, he cannot pretend to ignore the political
significance of the game.
"If this produces the kind of human results that we're all hoping it does,
this
could be something really big," Selig said. "I'm very proud of the role
we
will play in doing something constructive that transcends baseball."
Unfortunately, we've already seen the kinds of "human results" Castro is
capable of delivering. And no baseball game will fix those results. Clearly,
this is no time to play ball with Fidel Castro.
The writer is a political consultant in Houston.
© Copyright 1999 The Washington Post Company