U.S. Opponents of Cuba Embargo Are Optimistic
By Pablo Bachelet
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Despite a recent setback, American opponents
of the long-standing U.S. trade
embargo against Cuba think they stand a good chance of getting
the four-decade-old sanctions against
the Castro government eased this year.
A joint U.S. Senate and House of Representatives conference committee
earlier this month stripped
provisions from a budgetary appropriations bill that would have
relaxed travel and trade restrictions with
Cuba in 2003.
The amendments sought to deny the Bush administration funds needed
to enforce key elements of the
embargo, like a travel ban to Cuba for most Americans and a $1,200
annual cap on the remittances
Cuban-Americans can send to their relatives.
But a growing movement of embargo opponents in Congress feel they
are gaining ground and could
overturn or relax the four-decade-old sanctions against the regime
of Cuban President Fidel Castro.
"We're gaining momentum all the time," said Rep. Jeff Flake, an
Arizona Republican who fought hard to
overturn the embargo last year.
Flake argues that the administration should use its resources
to fight terrorism rather than "essentially
track down grandmothers traveling to Cuba."
Flake plans to present a bill that would end travel restrictions
to Cuba and says he has already garnered
50 Republican and Democrat co-sponsors.
The bill is the newest legislative initiative in a long standoff
that has pitted a well-organized Florida
Cuban-American constituency and the White House against a growing
coalition of business leaders and
bipartisan legislators that want to trade more with the Castro
regime.
BILL TO EASE TRADE
Two senators earlier this month presented a bill to make trade
with Cuba easier. "It is time to end the
embargo," said Sen. Max Baucus, a Democrat from Montana and one
of the bill's sponsors.
Embargo foes argue that sanctions have failed to force Castro
to implement democratic reforms, and they
point to how trade with China has triggered economic reforms
there.
Those backing the embargo say concessions to Castro should only
take place if the Cuban leader first
carries out democratic and human rights reforms.
Despite growing majorities in both chambers that favor lifting
sanctions, the Flake and Baucus bills face
crippling procedural delays and the threat of a White House veto.
But embargo supporters are going to have a harder time holding
their ground in the new 108th Congress,
opponents say.
Brian Alexander of the Cuba Policy Foundation, a bipartisan group
that wants to lift the embargo,
estimates a solid 230 House votes in favor of eliminating the
travel ban, against 148 congressmen who
oppose such a move.
FRIENDLIER SENATE
Cuba observers agree that the pro-embargo camp is getting weaker,
especially in the Senate, with the
recent departures of high-profile backers like Sens. Jesse Helms
and Robert Torricelli. "You're gaining
support and you're losing opposition," said Alexander.
This increases the chances that the House and Senate may be able
to agree to a common bill that foils
the kind of procedural delays that has thwarted past attempts
to ease sanctions.
But this does not mean the embargo opponents have a clear path
to victory. "All the central components
of the current stalemate are still in place," said Dan Erikson
of the Inter-American Dialogue, a Washington
think-tank.
These include a White House that refuses to budge on the embargo
and a House leadership under Texas
Rep. Tom DeLay that wants to maintain restrictions, despite some
Congress rank-and-file members who
prefer to ease the embargo.
And pro-embargo legislators, said Erikson, are well placed in
key committees to keep bills from even
getting voted on.
Even so, said Erikson, "since 2000, the anti-Castro constituency
has been playing defense as opposed to
offense. In the 1990s, they were playing offense and winning."
Back in 1996, for instance, Congress
approved the Helms-Burton Act, which tightened the embargo.
"We know that we have our work cut out for us," said Rep. Ileana
Ros-Lehtinen, a firm embargo backer
and a Cuban-American Florida Republican.
Recognizing that the pro-embargo camp has "lost some champions"
in the Senate, she nonetheless
remains upbeat, saying that other senators, like Virginia Republican
George Allen, will "step up at the
plate" to oppose initiatives easing sanctions.
Finally, she said the Cuba embargo group can count on a "true ally" in President Bush.
"As long as we have George W. in the White House, he will maintain
a firm line. He has told me personally
and he has said it publicly: He will not loosen sanctions against
Castro."