By JUAN O. TAMAYO
Herald Staff Writer
The Justice Department urged a Miami judge Thursday to block an attempt
to
seize millions of dollars in U.S. payments to Havana, saying the move was
illegal
and could sever U.S.-Cuba telephone links.
Justice's action came in a suit by relatives of the victims of the Brothers
to the
Rescue shoot-downs in 1996, who were awarded a $187 million judgment against
Havana by Miami federal Judge James Lawrence King in 1997.
The relatives have since been battling to collect on the judgment, and
recently filed
notice that they intended to garnishee payments made to Cuba's phone company
by AT&T, MCI and six other U.S. telephone firms.
``Our government is once again stepping in on the side of terrorists, said
Frank
Angones, one of the relatives' lawyers. ``We must force Cuba to accept
its guilt,
since our government has not seen fit to prosecute.''
In a 17-page ``Statement of Interest, Justice Department lawyers used an
unusual
opening argument: The U.S. trade embargo bans any financial dealings with
Cuba,
including garnishments, unless specifically licensed by Washington.
It added that Cuba's ETECSA phone company, a joint venture between the
government and an Italian firm, is an independent firm and therefore cannot
be
roped into the relatives' suit against the Cuban government and its air
force.
``The United States condemns the unlawful acts committed by [Cuba] and
sympathizes with the devastating losses experienced by the plaintiffs,
it said.
``Nevertheless, plaintiffs' interests must defer to . . . law.
But the statement went beyond legalities and into foreign policy, noting
that
Havana had vowed that it would cut U.S.-Cuba telephone links if its share
of the
income is garnisheed.
``Our position is very simple: If these services are not paid for, then
these services
will not continue, Foreign Ministry spokesman Alejandro Gonzalez repeated
Thursday.
``This result would seriously impair the United States' foreign policy
and
humanitarian goals with respect to Cuba, the Justice Department statement
said,
adding:
``Branches of the government have determined that maintaining direct
telecommunications services toward Cuba is a critical element of our policy
toward Cuba, and in particular of our policy to encourage development of
a civil
society independent of the Cuban government and to promote an eventual
peaceful transition to democracy.
The U.S. government, the statement added, ``has a strong humanitarian interest
in
enabling family members in both countries to maintain direct person-to-person
contact.
The statement is the second that the Justice Department has filed in the
complicated maneuvering unleashed as the relatives of the Brothers to the
Rescue
victims sought to collect on Judge King's $187 million judgment.
The relatives first went after tens of millions of dollars in Cuban assets
in the United
States frozen by the State Department since the 1960s, but ran into opposition
from the State and Treasury departments.
They then turned to the money being paid to Cuba by U.S. telephone firms
as
Havana's share of the costs of U.S.-Cuba telephone links. That amounted
to an
estimated $60 million to $70 million in 1997.
Further complicating the issue was a provision passed by Congress last
year
specifically lifting any immunity that might protect the U.S. assets of
foreign nations
blamed for terror attacks that kill U.S. citizens.
The provision was designed to help the relatives of victims of the Brothers
to the
Rescue downings -- shot down by Cuban MiGs over international airspace
-- as
well as the Pan Am Flight 007 downing in Lockerbie and a terror attack
in Israel
that killed an American teenager.
President Clinton signed the bill into law but immediately suspended its
application
under a disputed interpretation of its text.
The relatives of the victims involved in all three cases care about justice
and not
money, Angones said.
``The only weapon the families have in their hands is to pursue the Cuban
government through its assets, he said. ``It is clearly not what they want,
but for
the time being it is a moral sanction.
Herald staff writer David Kidwell contributed to this report.
Copyright © 1999 The Miami Herald