Rancor Rules Out Progress at Peace Talks in Mexico
By JULIA PRESTON
SAN CRISTOBAL DE LAS CASAS, Mexico -- After exchanging angry invective
for two
days, mediators from the Mexican Congress and top leaders of the Zapatista
rebels managed
Sunday to salvage
some semblance of peace talks, but only barely.
What was perhaps
most striking about the disastrous meeting -- the first such face-to-face
encounter
in nearly two
years -- was that the Zapatistas seemed to have lost their touch for media
showmanship
and public diplomacy on behalf of their Indian cause.
Zapatista commanders
had said that they had finally reached out to the mediating legislators,
federal
senators and
deputies who are members of the Concord and Pacification Commission, to
demonstrate
a renewed commitment to a peace dialogue.
But the 29 Zapatista
delegates, led by a fierce commander who goes by the nom de guerre of
Tacho, surprised
the legislators with a flurry of last-minute logistical demands. The Zapatistas
refused
to discuss the
problems with the lawmakers privately and then called them racist in front
of 2,500
cheering supporters
gathered here for a parallel Zapatista meeting.
One legislator
said that Tacho had told them he did not want to listen to their comments
because
they were "pure
saliva."
The Zapatistas,
rough-hewn Indian guerrillas who have lived hidden in harsh jungles since
they
staged a weeklong
armed uprising in January 1994, gave the impression that they were dissatisfied
mainly because
their fax machine was not working and they were not given mattresses for
their cots.
The legislators
responded late Saturday night with a five-page communique in which they
rejected
the Zapatistas'
complaints in blunt terms.
"We are not your
enemies -- you did not declare war on us," said the legislators, who are
serving
only as neutral
go-betweens for the rebels and the government.
The lawmakers
accused the Zapatistas of showing no interest in peace. In an ultimatum,
they said if
they did not
get more respectful treatment from the rebels, "We are at your disposal
to take you
back to the
places where you came from."
In the end mediators and rebels agreed to get together again late Sunday evening.
The Zapatistas
released a communique Saturday morning in which they said, as they have
before,
that they would
not return to direct peace talks until the government meets five broad
conditions,
including army
withdrawal from Zapatista areas and freeing of political prisoners. The
government
has not accepted
the conditions in the two years since the negotiations fell apart.
Even some of the Zapatistas' most loyal supporters said they were dismayed.
"You can't insult
someone and then say it was all right because that is the Indian way,"
commented
Carlos Monsivais,
a prominent writer and social critic, who is attending the meetings here.
Subcommander
Marcos, a non-Indian who is the Zapatistas' de facto leader, did not come
to the
sessions here,
but instead sent an audio recording in which he railed against the globalization
of the
world economy
but offered no concrete peace proposals.
The diplomatic
debacle overshadowed substantial progress the Zapatistas made in the strategy
sessions with
their followers here.
In a sign that
they are continuing to shape themselves into a civilian political group
in preparation for
one day laying
down arms, they organized their sympathizers to mount a nationwide mobilization
sometime next
year to publicize their platform for greater Indian independence.