Reformers Frustrated
By JANE BUSSEY
PUEBLA, Mexico -- Ana Teresa Aranda de Orea, mother of six and
opposition
stalwart, has campaigned across the dusty sierras of central
Mexico, been
beaten and kicked by riot police and faced down officials who
were telling welfare
recipients whom to vote for.
``You cannot believe how tough politics is here,'' said Aranda,
who narrowly lost
her run for senator on the conservative National Action Party
(PAN) ticket in
Puebla, a state east of Mexico City still controlled by the 71-year-old
Institutional
Revolutionary Party, the PRI.
But last Sunday night, the 46-year-old Aranda finally witnessed
what she had
never quite believed could happen: a peaceful vote sweeping an
entrenched and
discredited ruling party out of power. The PAN's Vicente Fox,
a 58-year-old
rancher and former Coca-Cola Co. executive, had beaten PRI candidate
Francisco
Labastida for Mexico's presidency.
``It was a long-held dream,'' said Aranda. ``At that moment, truly,
I started to cry.
Just thinking that the injustices, the arrogance, the corruption
and the
tremendous marginalization of the poor that has been part of
our lives for so long
was ending and we were turning a new page so we could live a
new life in this
country!''
Aranda's individual struggle through decades of civic and political
activism
represents one set of footsteps in the country's long march toward
democracy.
Tens of thousands of Mexicans, in the barrios and in the boardrooms,
in rallies
and in hunger strikes, from the political right to the left,
fought to end the grip of a
party that had outworn its welcome after seven decades in power.
The change didn't happen overnight. The drama and turbulence of
Mexican history
had been accelerating in the past 20 or so years, an era marked
by brazen
electoral fraud, opposition killings, political assassinations,
a regional insurgency
and constant skirmishes at the ballot box.
Throughout it all, the PRI desperately sought to maintain its
grip on power. But in
the end it was obliged to yield to the forces of democratic change
that had been
growing and gaining confidence despite -- or perhaps because
of -- repeated
defeats.
Now that it has happened, historians, pundits and political commentators
cite a
number of significant milestones on the road to the historic
election of last
Sunday:
The 1985 Mexico City earthquake, which created a level
of grass-roots activism
that began as a social self-help movement but quickly became
political.
The 1982 nationalization of banks that shocked the nation,
spelled the end of
prosperity and thwarted middle-class aspirations for a large
segment of a
population that had believed itself until then to be upwardly
mobile.
The 1968 student uprising that ended in bloodshed in the
Mexico City
neighborhood known as Tlateloco, forever tarnishing the PRI's
image as protector
of the people. Hundreds of students and supporters were killed
when soldiers and
civilian agents opened fire on a mass anti-government rally.
Luís Echeverría, the
PRI government minister who ordered the operation, went on to
become Mexico's
next president.
The result of these and many other similar events led Mexicans
to conclude that
their system was oppressive.
But until the very end, it was not a struggle that received much
international
support or attention. People who fought Latin American dictatorships
were
considered heroes, notes Carlo Arce, a PAN legislator from Guanajuato.
But not
anyone fighting Mexico's ``perfect dictatorship'' -- a term coined
by Peruvian writer
Mario Vargas Llosa, who visited Mexico City in 1989, to refer
to the PRI -- which
maintained the appearance, but not the substance, of democracy
by combining
paternalism with selective repression and corruption.
REFORMERS FRUSTRATED
The frustration of the political reformers and their evident lack
of support outside of
Mexico culminated on the night of July 6, 1988, when Carlos Salinas
de Gortari
brazenly declared victory in the presidential race over PRI breakaway
challenger
Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas -- before any results were
in.
The absence of a proof of victory did not seem to matter to the
heads of state who
sent their congratulatory telegrams to Salinas immediately. Among
them: former
U.S. President Ronald Reagan and Cuban President Fidel Castro
Abroad, the PRI was seen not only as a stabilizing factor, especially
by
Washington, but until 1988 most Mexicans seemed content with
their one-party
system, whatever its excesses. Indeed, PRI governments from the
1940s onward
were able to deliver 6 percent annual growth rates, which greatly
improved the
welfare of Mexicans.
Historian Enrique Krauze traces the roots of the July 2 election
back 20 years --
when former President José López Portillo promised
Mexicans a future of
abundance, based on Mexico's vast oil reserves, but instead proceeded
to
nationalize the banks and eventually bequeathed the nation its
$100 billion debt
crisis.
The new ``technocrats,'' U.S.-educated economists such as Salinas
and
President Ernesto Zedillo, were never able to restore the economic
growth rates of
the 1960s despite privatizing state-run companies, opening the
borders or signing
the North American Free Trade Agreement with Canada and the United
States.
DEADLY EARTHQUAKE
Poet and environmental activist Homero Aridjis traces the beginnings
of change to
Sept. 19, 1985, when an earthquake measuring 8.5 on the Richter
scale killed at
least 12,000 people and leveled parts of the capital.
While former President Miguel de la Madrid stayed out of the public
eye for two
days, his government paralyzed, ordinary Mexicans rushed to rescue
victims
trapped in ruined buildings, set up soup kitchens for the homeless
and realized
they could act alone.
``The 1985 earthquake was a social and political earthquake. It
shook the system
to the roots and awakened the opposition forces in grass-roots
society,'' Aridjis
said.
The de la Madrid administration witnessed the rise of the PAN,
an elite party
founded in conservative Catholics in 1939 that had never built
a popular base.
When PAN candidates began winning mayors' races in the northern
state of
Chihuahua, the PRI/government began resorting to fraud.
In the 1986 gubernatorial race in that state, PRI operatives stuffed
ballot boxes,
robbed others or simply tampered with the vote count. Feeling
cheated, PAN
activist Luís H. Alvarez of Chihuahua staged a hunger
strike to demand the vote
be respected. The national attention he drew indicated that more
and more
Mexicans were tiring of a system that tolerated electoral fraud.
Alvarez's hunger strike led to another significant event in the
evolution of the
political system: Manuel Clouthier, one of the nation's leading
businessmen,
decided to join the PAN and turn it into a true national organization
with
grass-roots support.
Meanwhile, inside the PRI, Cárdenas was leading an internal
rebellion to try to
wrest control from the technocrats. The 1988 presidential elections
were a
watershed in this struggle as Cárdenas broke from the
PRI and ran against
Salinas, supported by grass-roots groups that grew up after the
earthquake.
Clouthier, the first PAN candidate to have the popular touch,
also threw his hat in
the ring. Although he was killed in a car crash in 1989, Clouthier
further
contributed to the party's eventual success by recruiting new
leaders such as Fox
and Aranda.
TAINTED VICTORY
When, on the night of July 6, 1988, Salinas declared a victory
that would always
be questioned -- since 40 percent of the ballot results were
never made public, as
required by law -- he also proved prophetic in declaring the
end of the one-party
state.
Indeed, his tainted victory changed everything.
After the 1988 elections, Mexicans read news reports saying that
ballots were
burned, buried or dumped by the side of the road. Even those
made cynical by
decades of PRI domination were outraged, and the opposition became
more
determined than ever.
Its members concluded that the only way to win was to reform electoral
laws so
that an autonomous agency and not the government was in charge
of the process
-- and to station poll watchers everywhere to stop electoral
fraud before it
happened.
Refusing to be co-opted by the system, the defeated Cárdenas
formed his own
party, the Party of the Democratic Revolution, which had to wage
its own fight
against repression as more than 300 activists were killed in
the early 1990s,
according to party officials.
OPPOSITION RISES
Elsewhere in Mexico, other opposition leaders sprang up to defy
the PRI and
demand that the government live up to its claim of democracy.
In the rugged central state of San Luís Potosí,
respected doctor Salvador Nava
ran for governor in opposition to the PRI in a tainted 1990 election.
His struggle to
have the government recognize his victory, including a March
for Dignity from the
state capital to Mexico City, finally coalesced a grass-roots
movement of the right
and left to work for democratic elections.
``I have been at this for nine years,'' said Rogelio Gómez-Hermosillo,
coordinator
of the Civic Alliance, a non-government organization that monitors
elections. ``I
am tired.''
Fox also began his struggle, running for governor in the central
state of
Guanajuato in 1991, finally winning in 1994 as the PRI tacitly
acknowledged that,
in a true democracy, it could not win every election every time,
as it had for
decades.
Fox immediately began planning his run for the top office in 2000.
GRASS-ROOTS LEADERS
Meanwhile, grass-roots leaders like Aranda were sprouting up all
over the country.
She joined a women's civic group at age 17. Her political efforts
began in 1989
when she joined the PAN and tried to run for mayor of Puebla.
The PRI-dominated legislature refused to grant her legal residency,
even though
she had lived in the state the required five years.
``They said I was not `dignified, nor relevant nor respectable,'''
Aranda recalled.
But she was not to be stopped. A communications specialist by
training, she
took her husband and six children, set up a tent on the square
in front of the state
legislature and camped out in protest.
After nine days, officials relented, she said, because they did
not want to
embarrass Salinas, who was traveling to Washington to receive
one of many
awards for statesmanship.
For the last decade, Aranda has been trying to force the hand
of PRI government
both to provide services for citizens and to hold clean elections.
For several years, she said, she spent hours every day standing
in front of tax
offices, holding a bullhorn and urging the poor to ask for fairer
property taxes. She
and others painted 3,000 potholes blue to force the local PRI
government to repair
the streets, a kind of civic activism that would once have been
considered totally
alien to the Mexican political system.
UNSUNG HEROES
Across the nation, there are thousands of unsung heroes like Aranda.
Myriam Arabian, 40, who is the coordinator of the Citizen's Coordinating
Council
in Puebla, another grass-roots group, had worked since 1992 to
bring about last
Sunday's stunning defeat of the PRI.
``It was a myth that died, the myth of power, because the PRI
was nothing more
than a group of men who all protected the same interests,'' Arabian
said.
Last Sunday's vote came as such a surprise because many Mexicans
were still
afraid of telling pollsters how they planned to vote.
But they believed the changes in election rules and the advertising
campaign that
said the vote was secret and free. Under PRI pressure, they publicly
promised to
vote for the PRI -- then went to the ballot box and voted their
conscience.
PAN activist Alvarez said in an interview after the elections
in 1988 that many
people would have to die to bring democracy to Mexico. But in
the end, the PRI's
demise, the product of years of struggle by its opponents, came
with a whimper
instead of a bang, and the prediction of the man who staged the
first important
hunger strike did not come true.
Last Sunday, a smiling Alvarez sat alongside PAN leaders to celebrate
the victory
of its presidential candidate in the freest election in Mexican
history.