By John Ward Anderson
Washington Post Foreign Service
Sunday, October 4, 1998; Page A36
ACTEAL, Mexico—Nine months after 45 people from this tiny hillside
hamlet were killed in a Christmas week massacre, things have returned
more or less to normal.
Residents are back in their homes -- mostly single-room huts housing as
many as three Indian families. The residents have no land of their own.
About half the adults have jobs doing handcrafts but no salaries since
their
labor is part of a collective effort to feed and clothe the community.
Children spend time listening to music and playing volleyball because there
is no school -- or clinic, or running water, or for that matter any other
services to distinguish this village of 520 people from an unkempt,
makeshift camp clinging precariously to the side of a mountain.
In that and other respects, Acteal is not dissimilar from many other towns
and villages in Mexico's southern state of Chiapas. And that helps explain
why, almost five years ago, this impoverished state spawned a
revolutionary uprising by masked Zapatista rebels demanding greater
Indian rights and political, social and economic reforms.
It also helps explain why so many people are unlikely to vote in elections
Sunday to select a new 40-member state legislature and mayors in
Chiapas' 111 municipalities. Election results, many from remote, rural
communities, are not expected until midweek.
Mexico has a busy election season this year. Important governors' races
in
10 states are seen as a harbinger of the presidential race in 2000, when
analysts say opposition parties have a good chance of taking Mexico's
highest office away from the ruling Institutional Revolutionary Party,
known by its Spanish initials as PRI, for the first time in 70 years.
Opposition parties have won two of the six governors' races held so far,
an outcome that many see as a healthy sign that the country is becoming
more open and democratic, with freer and fairer elections.
Chiapas, which political analysts say the PRI has long ruled as a fiefdom,
is a different story.
Besides PRI power brokers, it is hard to find anyone who believes that
Chiapas should be staging an election Sunday. The Zapatista National
Liberation Army -- as the rebels are officially called -- has no candidates
and its supporters are considered unlikely to vote. Between 50,000 and
70,000 Mexican army troops are stationed at roadblocks and in
encampments around the state. And at least six and possibly as many as
14 paramilitary-style groups of armed civilians -- most aligned with the
ruling PRI -- operate in many parts of Chiapas. One of these groups was
blamed for the massacre here.
In some cases, elections are being held for mayors of municipalities that
include huge groups of people who do not recognize the authority of the
state or local government and who -- like the residents of Acteal, about
four hours northeast of Chiapas's capital, Tuxtla Gutierrez -- have
declared themselves and their communities "autonomous."
On top of all that, floods ravaged many parts of the state earlier this
month, particularly the low-lying coastal areas, killing at least 185 people
and isolating dozens of communities. The state has postponed voting in
coastal areas containing about 328,000 voters, or about 17 percent of the
1.9 million electorate.
On a tour of Chiapas 10 days ago, President Ernesto Zedillo said that
redressing the state's problems is one of his administration's top priorities
but that much still needs to be done.
"Chiapas is much more than a natural disaster, more than a political
conflict," he said. "It is a challenge of social justice for millions of
Mexicans." Saying Chiapas receives more federal aid than any other state
-- almost $7 billion in the last three years for building schools, hospitals,
roads, water systems and other projects -- Zedillo declared, "The
attention of the federal government is not new and will not fade."
Claiming that 68 percent of the Chiapas voting population comes from
flood-ravaged areas, or parts of the state where residents are subject
to
intimidation by armed groups, the Civic Alliance, a pro-democracy group
and respected independent election watchdog, recommended postponing
the balloting -- a position backed by many independent observers.
"Many here are displaced people from other communities and it's not
possible for them to go home to vote because the countryside is full of
[Mexican army] soldiers and paramilitaries," said Augustin Vazquez Ruiz,
a community leader in Acteal whose niece, her husband and their three
young children were killed in the massacre. About 90 people have been
arrested in the killings. Many are members of a paramilitary-style group
aligned with the ruling PRI, including the mayor of the municipality, the
equivalent of a county, in which Acteal is located.
Despite the calls for postponement, the state government is pushing
forward with the balloting out of eagerness to restore a semblance of
normal life in this conflict-weary state -- and fear that a delay would
be
seen as a sign of weakness. The rebel group, which boycotted and
actively impeded voting last year, released a statement yesterday saying
it
would neither participate in nor distract from voting.
In the highly charged atmosphere surrounding the election, opposition
political leaders have accused the PRI of using governmental flood relief
to
buy votes. Zedillo and Chiapas Gov. Roberto Albores Guillen have
denied the charge. Insisting that, "there will be free elections," Albores
said
tying aid to votes would be irresponsible. He added: "We cannot give aid
[to further] party or political goals."
Be that as it may, Chiapas continues to rank at or near the bottom of
almost every human development category in comparison with other
Mexican states -- particularly those in the north. More than two-thirds
of
the state's roughly 4 million people are malnourished, for example, and
almost 60 percent of children between 5 and 14 do not attend school.
A report by the Boston-based Physicians for Human Rights earlier this
year said evidence collected in Chiapas "strongly suggests that Mexican
government programs to alleviate poverty and social inequality in Chiapas
are cosmetic in nature, and that the government has abdicated its
responsibility to ensure the provision of neutral health care to civilians
in
the conflict zone."
Many observers think it is no coincidence that the state has one of the
highest percentages of indigenous peoples in Mexico -- about 35 percent
of the people are descended from Mayan Indians.
Following the Acteal massacre, Zapatistas demanded the disarming of
paramilitary groups as a condition for resuming peace negotiations, and
the government promised an aggressive crackdown on armed civilian
groups. Virtually no action has been taken against any of the groups, some
of whose leaders have been identified publicly as PRI members of the
state legislature. Zedillo even flew to Chiapas and gave a government
check to one of the groups, Peace and Justice, widely recognized by
human rights workers as one of the most violent paramilitary-style
organizations in the state.
© Copyright 1998 The Washington Post Company