Virtual fence debacle demands investigation
Boeing profits despite the failure of its border work
ANNE T. DENOGEAN
Tucson Citizen
The high-tech virtual fence meant to secure 28 miles of U.S. border
near Sasabe officially is known as Project 28.
But after revelations that the $20.6 million fence built by Boeing
Corp. doesn't work right, elected officials from Arizona are calling it
"a disgrace," "a boondoggle" and "a fiasco."
The virtual fence was part of the Department of Homeland Security's
Secure Border Initiative, a multibillion dollar program launched in 2005
to protect the U.S-Mexico border with physical barriers (including 370
miles of pedestrian fence and 300 miles of vehicle fence) and enhanced
surveillance and communication technologies.
DHS accepted the project from Boeing on Feb. 22. Days later, a representative
of the Government Accountability Office testified before a U.S. House of
Representatives subcommittee that Project 28 "is not an optimal system"
and would soon have to be replaced with newer technologies.
Boeing developed and designed the system with only minimal input from
the Border Patrol, the agency using it, according to the testimony.
Technical issues delayed delivery of the system. The software Boeing
selected was intended for law enforcement dispatch and was not designed
to handle the type of information being collected by the cameras, radar
and sensors, according to GAO testimony. It was taking too long for radar
information to display in command centers. And the radar systems "were
being activated by rain or other environmental factors, making the system
unusable."
As Boeing worked to correct the problems, others arose. As of February,
the resolution of camera images was limited to five kilometers (3.1 miles),
when the cameras were expected to work at twice that distance.
Project 28 was a pilot program. Instead of deeming it a failure and
moving on, DHS has thrown two more contracts at Boeing. One is $64.5 million
to, among other things, upgrade the software used in Project 28. The other
is $69 million to begin planning for virtual fence systems in other areas
of the Border Patrol's Tucson sector and the Yuma and El Paso sectors.
The debacle has left questions about where we go from here with border
security.
Rep. Raúl Grijalva, D-Ariz., said the most disturbing thing
about this whole episode is that it was predictable.
"There was a rush on the part of administration and Homeland Security
to do something on the border,'' he said.
"And I think every time you make a political response in haste in order
to satisfy a political agenda and not really look at what the ramifications
and the consequences are going to be, you end up with these boondoggles."
He said Project 28 shows that a fence is not the silver bullet of border
security. Solutions to securing the border must be as multifaceted and
complex as the border itself, he said.
"I hope this causes people to stop and say, 'We can't continue to keep
throwing money at this issue. We have to do it in a way that is effective
and this is not effective.' "
Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, D-Ariz., who supports the use of technology
and other innovative techniques to secure the border, blames the shortcomings
of the fence on the failure of DHS and Boeing to consult with the Border
Patrol.
"These are the men and women who are on the ground, in the field, securing
our borders and they weren't consulted at all," Giffords said.
She filed a bill, the Border Security Accountability Act, on Thursday
to demand more accountability from DHS.
For fiscal 2008, which started Oct. 1, DHS received $32 billion in
regular appropriations and $1.8 billion in emergency supplemental funds,
yet the department has no regular reporting requirements, Giffords said.
Her bill would require reports every 90 days.
"With my legislation in place I think that we would have been able
to prevent the Project 28 fiasco," she said.
Randy Graf, a former state representative who was the Republican candidate
for the seat held by Republican Jim Kolbe and won by Giffords in 2006,
said the best assessment of the virtual fence came from U.S. Rep. Duncan
Hunter of California.
"He said, 'The virtual fence is virtually useless.' And I would agree
with that."
Graf said virtual fences and unmanned aerial drones, even when they
work, only detect activity and do not actually stop people from crossing
the border.
He said the solution to stopping illegal immigration is real fences,
augmented by an increase in Border Patrol and military manpower at the
border.
He calls for tripling the Border Patrol force, increasing the National
Guard presence at the border and bringing in military forces if needed.
"It's just the physical presence as a deterrence, saying 'This isn't
where you cross. We've got ports of entry where you can cross legally,
just going through the process.' And I think we could bring order to the
border in very short order."
State Rep. Russell Pearce, R-Mesa, a hard-liner on illegal immigration,
said border security can be achieved by a combination of regular fences,
double-layer fences enhanced by technology and virtual fences.
Despite the failure of Project 28, the technology exists or can be
developed for a working virtual fence, Pearce said.
The real problem, he said, is the "scoundrels" in Washington, D.C.,
who continue to ignore the will of the American people, who want the laws
enforced and the border secured. It's up to Americans to vote politicians
who won't protect them out of office, he said.
A total of 168 miles of pedestrian fence and 135 of vehicle fence have
been built, but delays in finishing a promised 670 miles total are anticipated.
"We have the ability, the technology and the resources to secure that
border. The only thing preventing us is the (lack of) political will to
protect Americans as they have a right to be protected," he said.
Kolbe, the former Republican congressman whose district included 100
miles of the U.S. border with Mexico, believes this debacle should lead
back to where the discussion started - comprehensive immigration, reform.
"I think the lesson that ought to be learned is that attempts to build
a physical barrier, whether you do it as a virtual fence or whether you
do it with wire or steel, are bound to fail in terms of keeping out people.
They'll always find ways to get into the United States," Kolbe said.
"You can't solve the problem if you don't deal with all the pieces
of the puzzle. And that means to provide for work permits for people to
come in and work temporarily in the United States, for ways for employers
make sure they know who they are hiring and to deal with the people who
are here in the United States on an illegal basis."
Anne T. Denogean can be reached at 573-4582 and adenogean@tucsoncitizen.com.