Survey to measure differences in ideology between longtime Cuban immigrants, new arrivals
By Madeline Baró Diaz
Miami Bureau
A University of Miami project has taken the first steps toward measuring
the ideological divide between newly arrived Cubans and those who
have lived in the United States for decades.
A preliminary survey of 208 newly arrived Cubans recently found that
the new arrivals distrust the established Cuban exile community in the
United States and
institutions in Cuba. That has implications for a post-Castro transition
in Cuba, said Andy Gómez, co-director of the project and a senior
fellow at the UM Institute
for Cuban and Cuban-American Studies.
"[The transition] will be slower than many people would want to admit to," Gómez said.
Researchers hope to use the early findings to secure funding for a broader
study of the Cuban-American community, Gómez said. The survey results
will be released
at 7 p.m. tonight at a workshop at UM's Casa Bacardi, 1531 Brescia
Avenue, Coral Gables.
The panel that researched and compiled the pilot study was composed
of representatives from the medical, sociology, education and political
fields. Its members
interviewed Cubans who had been in the country a month or less at the
Church World Service office in Miami-Dade, where many refugees are processed.
The
respondents were asked questions that measured their opinions about
the Cuban exile community, Cuba's political system and economy, and their
own value
systems.
Of those interviewed, 65 percent said they were in favor of Cuban exiles returning to Cuba, but 34 percent said they distrusted the exile community.
The findings show that exiles living outside the country have to be
supportive of ideas coming from those on the island, even if the ideas
clash with the exile
community's notions of democracy and what Cuba should be, Gómez
said.
"Importing value systems from outside Cuba could be very detrimental to change," he said.
About 53 percent of those surveyed said they were against the U.S. embargo on Cuba; 33 percent were in favor. The rest did not answer.
Copyright © 2004