Politicians' farming interests lead to drought of laws for workers
FIELDS OF DESPAIR
BY RONNIE GREENE
In Florida, politics and produce are intertwined.
Agricultural interests have poured at least $35 million into
state and federal political campaigns in Florida since 1996, powerful proof
of the industry's ties
with decision-makers.
Yet the ties run deeper than campaign cash to candidates, committees
and parties. The House Committee on Agriculture, which helps shape state
laws
over the industry, is stacked with politician-farmers.
Seven of the committee's 14 members are growers or have ties
to agriculture, their financial-disclosure forms show. The influential
chairwoman, Marsha
''Marty'' Bowen, R-Winter Haven, is a citrus grower.
Advocates seeking to overhaul agriculture's darkest corners often
encounter dead ends. This year, two farmworker reform bills died in the
Legislature
without even a vote.
Advocates view the defeats as part of a larger pattern in which growers remain largely unscathed while workers toil under arduous conditions.
''If there weren't any state troopers on the highway, I'd probably
drive faster,'' said Gregory S. Schell, a Lake Worth lawyer with the Migrant
Farmworker
Justice Project of Florida Legal Services. ``There aren't any
state troopers on the labor highway.''
''Passing pro-farmworker legislation in this state -- forget it,'' Schell said.
Abuse abounds in agriculture-rich Florida. Five slavery prosecutions
since 1996 have sent Sunshine State crew bosses and smugglers to prison,
hundreds
of crew chiefs have had their licenses revoked for skirting
laws, and a Herald review exposed ongoing exploitation in North Florida
farm country.
This year, Rep. Frank Peterman Jr., D-St. Petersburg, tried to trigger change.
A church pastor as well as a state legislator, Peterman said
he was inspired after a group from the Coalition of Immokalee Workers came
to his church two
years ago, prompting him to visit workers in the field.
''I was moved spiritually to take on their issue in the state
Legislature,'' said Peterman, now pastor of The Rock of Jesus Missionary
Baptist Church in St.
Petersburg. ``I haven't stopped since.''
He once spearheaded a campaign to provide long-sleeve T-shirts
to more than 3,000 state farmworkers -- long-sleeve so workers wouldn't
get cuts and
infections from pesticides. Last year, he pushed a bill that
did pass that precludes farm contractors from profiting from equipment
they provide to workers.
That minor measure took two years to gain approval.
POWERFUL INDUSTRY
Wages and pesticide
bills fail to go anywhere
At this year's session, he proposed two bills. One would allow
workers to sue growers in state court if they were cheated on pay. The
other would grant
workers the right to data on pesticides.
Neither bill made it to the floor for a vote.
''The root of the problem is that politicians throughout Florida
know that agriculture is a powerful interest in this state, and you don't
want to get on the
wrong side of them,'' said Rob Williams, director of the Migrant
Farmworker Justice Project in Tallahassee, who helped craft the bills.
The wages bill went to the House committee headed by citrus grower
Bowen. In December 2001, she listed a net worth of $872,300, with her largest
assets a residence, citrus grove, barn and pasture in Haines
City. Her largest income source was Bowen Brothers Inc., a family business
in Dundee.
''Agriculture is a major contributor to the state's economy [In
2000, total cash receipts were $6.95 billion],'' Bowen wrote in response
to Herald questions.
``It behooves the Agriculture Committee, and the Legislature
as a whole, to have committee members knowledgeable of the subject being
regulated.''
Twice in March, Peterman wrote to her, asking that she put the
wages bill on the agenda ''at your earliest convenience.'' Rep. Marco Rubio,
R-Miami, was a
co-sponsor. On the Senate side, a companion measure was proposed
by Sen. Mandy Dawson, D-Fort Lauderdale, and Anthony C. Hill Sr., D-Jacksonville.
''This bill is a remedy for unpaid wages to Migrant Workers,''
Peterman wrote to Bowen. ``The bill guarantees payment of wages by persons
utilizing the
services of Farm Labor Contractors.''
It never happened. Said Peterman: ``It didn't move.''
Bowen did not respond to requests for an interview but did provide written answers.
She said she requested that Peterman come and discuss both bills with her. ''Such discussion was not held,'' she wrote.
Yet she made clear that she opposed the measures.
She said the wages bill was aimed at the wrong party.
''If workers are not receiving minimum wage, most likely it is
a labor subcontractor who is at fault,'' Bowen wrote. ``The grower is not
responsible for the
actions of a subcontractor.''
Of the pesticide measure, she wrote: ``There are existing federal
regulations covering pesticide use. I don't believe there is a need to
adopt more
regulations that mirror those already in existence.''
Another committee member, Rep. Dwight Stansel, D-Live Oak, is
a full-time farmer. Stansel said he believes the criminal cases brought
to light thus far are
``the exception, not the rule.''
''I'm going to be real reluctant to put a lot more restrictions,'' Stansel said.
These legislators' views mirror those of industry groups.
''My God, we've got enough laws we've got to live with without
having more,'' said Walter Kates, director of the Division of Labor Relations
for the Florida
Fruit and Vegetable Association, a trade group.
Farmworkers can sue growers in federal court now. Wage-bill proponents
counter that federal cases can take years to course through the system,
bogging
down in legal disputes over whether growers are co-employers
of the workers.
Williams, of the Migrant Farmworker Justice Project, said the
new law would say simply: ``If you employ a farm labor contractor, you
guarantee the
workers are going to be paid the minimum wage.''
Others who work to expose abuse of farmworkers say the wage bill would have made a difference.
'The belief is, the day after that bill is passed, the grower
will call in the contractor. `I don't care how it's been done in the past.
It's a new day,' '' said
Douglas Molloy, a Fort Myers federal prosecutor who has handled
farmworker slavery cases.
Industry officials say work sites already post pesticide information.
Bill proponents say postings are spotty and the proposal would have allowed
workers
to get more detailed data about pesticide dangers simply by
asking.
Peterman called the pesticide bill a ``no-brainer . . . public health for human beings.''
ABUSE ACKNOWLEDGED
But committee members
don't blame the growers
Some House Agriculture Committee members say that farmworker conditions have improved but acknowledge that abuse still occurs.
''I know what happens out there,'' said Rep. Richard A. Machek,
D-Delray Beach, who spent 40 years in the industry. ''These labor contractors
rent these
old labor camps, and they allow the employee to run up a tab
at the little commissary or they front them some money. They never can
pay it back. It's like
one of these loan sharks. This is the 21st century. Things like
that shouldn't be happening.'' But even then, Machek said he is reluctant
to blame growers.
''If he writes a check to the labor contractor and the labor
contractor doesn't pay the employee, I don't know [if] that should be the
farmer's responsibility,''
he said.
Machek said the industry is already struggling to keep its market
share against countries such as citrus-rich Brazil -- forcing the farmer
to produce his crop
for the least amount of money he can.
Rep. Baxter G. Troutman, R-Winter Haven, who described himself
as a small citrus grower, said the industry's role is so vital that the
Legislature must be
sure that bad legislation is not written.
''There is already so much environmental, statutory, global marketplace
pressure on the farmer these days,'' said Troutman, who owns 122 acres
of Central
Florida citrus groves valued at more than $1 million.
The U.S. Department of Labor's wage and hour division enforces
laws that include the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection
Act, which sets
rules regarding pay, housing and transportation.
The federal agency has gone after some of Florida's most troubled
contractor crew bosses, the middlemen employed by farmers to bring laborers
to the
fields. More than 200 contractors and top assistants are currently
prohibited from working in that capacity, accounting for 43 percent of
all those barred in
the United States.
Yet crew leaders ''are just the puppets,'' said Lucas Benitez,
co-founder of the Coalition of Immokalee Workers, a nonprofit group that
rallies against
worker abuse and has helped authorities uncover crimes.
He and others say those in higher positions hold the ultimate
power. Yet they are punished less than crew bosses. Growers have not been
prosecuted in
any of the slavery cases.
''The white guys never go to jail,'' lawyer Schell said.
Some reformers believe change should come not only from growers but from large corporations that buy Florida fruits and vegetables in bulk.
''The real answer and long-term solution to slavery is getting
those end users involved,'' said Greg Asbed, a staff member of the Coalition
of Immokalee
Workers. ``It totally breaks the tired old stalemate.''
The coalition has targeted Yum! Brands Inc., the parent company
of Taco Bell, which buys Florida tomatoes in bulk. The coalition notes
that while Yum!
reported more than $4 million in compensation for its chief
executive officer last year, it buys tomatoes picked by workers struggling
to get by.
Despite pickets at the Kentucky headquarters of Yum! and rallies
across the United States, the company maintains that the dispute should
be resolved by
other parties. ''It certainly rests between the growers and
[their] employees,'' said Laurie Gannon, a Taco Bell spokeswoman.
She said the companywants to be sure ``all the laws are being followed and that they are being treated fairly and earned minimum wage.''
Laura Germino, another coalition representative, contrasts the
Yum! response to that of the chocolate industry two years ago after Knight
Ridder
Newspapers published an exposé of how child slavery tainted
the chocolate industry.
Within days, chocolate manufacturers offered their support to
combat slavery. Likewise, Germino said, agricultural interests ``have the
market power to
use their strength to do good.''