Mexico to Look Into Missing Millions Saved for Braceros
By RICH CONNELL and ROBERT J. LOPEZ, Times Staff Writers
Moving to heal a generations-old wound, Mexican government officials will
announce
Monday an investigation into the alleged disappearance of millions of dollars
deducted from
the earnings of laborers who came north to work U.S. fields and railroads
after the onset of
World War II.
The probe could be the best and last hope for thousands of the surviving
migrants to find
out what happened to money that was supposed to have been set aside for
them when they
returned home. Now in their 70s and 80s, many are destitute and complain
that they never
received the funds.
Their demands have gained momentum in the last few years but have generated
little
government interest. Now, in a sign of the changes occurring since the
defeat of the deeply
rooted Institutional Revolutionary Party, a point man for President Vicente
Fox said the new
administration strongly endorses the probe.
"We need to find out exactly what [is] or is not owed," said Juan Hernandez,
director of the president's office on Mexicans living
abroad.
Fox, who toppled the world's longest-ruling political party in elections
last summer, has declared a new era of government
openness. He also has made the economic and social well-being of Mexican
nationals in the U.S. a priority for his administration.
"This is a new government with a completely new attitude," Hernandez said
in Los Angeles last week. He said Fox's interest in
Mexicans abroad extends to the workers who helped with the war effort under
the so-called bracero program.
"It's a good thing that the government is doing this. . . . If it wasn't
for that, we might not have a chance," said 77-year-old Luis
Magaña of Stockton, who picked crops from Idaho to California soon
after the United States was drawn into the war.
The investigation comes amid a wave of organizing among the braceros and
support by the Fox administration and U.S.
legislators for a new guest worker program.
In addition, attorneys in the U.S. are preparing to file a class-action
lawsuit on behalf of former braceros on both sides of the
border. The suit is expected to name both governments and two Mexican banks.
The Mexican inquiry will be conducted by a special multi-party commission
of the Mexican Congress as well as federal
prosecutors. Their goal will be to track the money, which was held by two
Mexican banks that have since merged into other financial
institutions.
Record-Keeping Lapses May Slow Investigation
Any investigation of the savings fund will be complicated by the passage
of time and the possibility that records no longer exist.
One of the Mexican banks has said it does not know what became of the workers'
savings.
Many of the braceros no longer have pay stubs or other documents proving
what they earned. Some workers did collect their
savings, but it is unclear how many.
A lawmaker who pushed for the effort said the government must provide answers
to the workers. "We owe it to them," said
Michoacan Rep. Sergio Acosta of the left-of-center Democratic Revolution
Party.
Researchers who have studied the braceros say that addressing the program's
unfinished business has a historical significance
beyond settling old debts.
The migrant workers were lauded by U.S. government and business leaders
as indispensable to the war effort.
"Some described them as a godsend," said Erasmo Gamboa, a history professor
at the University of Washington. "But 50 years
later, it's as if they contributed nothing."
The bracero program was approved by both countries shortly after the bombing
of Pearl Harbor. Nearly 300,000 Mexicans
came to help pick crops and maintain railways as American workers went
off to war.
From 1942 to 1949, 10% of each worker's paycheck was to be deducted and
forwarded through the U.S. government to
savings accounts in Mexico. Estimates of the current value of money collected
and allegedly owed vary widely. With interest, some
activists and scholars estimate, hundreds of millions of dollars could
be due the braceros.
What is clear is that at least $32 million had been taken from the braceros'
wages by 1946, according to U.S. government
records from the time.
The money was both an incentive to return to Mexico and an effort to help
the workers improve their lives when they got home.
"Innocent, hard-working people came here when it was in the interests of
both countries [for them] to do so," said Matt Piers, an
attorney with Gessler Hughes & Socol, the Chicago firm leading the
prospective class-action suit. "These folks were totally proper in
their entry and their labor. And they got ripped off."
Even if the funds can't be found, lawyers hope to build a case proving
that the governments and banks are still liable.
Much of the controversy has focused on Mexico. But under the international
accord, the U.S. government was responsible for
ensuring that workers received proper benefits. Federal agencies were officially
the "employer" of the braceros, a requirement sought
by Mexican officials to help protect the workers' rights.
Public records reviewed by The Times show that problems soon developed
on both sides of the border with oversight of the
contracts and the savings program.
In Arizona, the U.S. wartime agency responsible for policing the program
was ignoring requirements that representatives of the
Mexican government be on hand when workers signed contracts, according
to a 1944 memo by the federal Fair Employment
Practices Committee. The officials were supposed to advise workers, many
of them illiterate, on their rights, including the savings
fund.
In Michigan, braceros were not being given pay slips to keep track of how
much they were owed, according to a 1945
Department of Agriculture memo.
Eighty-year-old Daniel Carillo said he wasn't told about the savings program
when he signed up. "Nobody explained it to me,"
said Carillo, who arrived in 1942 to help maintain New York railroad tracks
and went on to pick crops from Arkansas to California.
He learned of the savings program a year later when a middleman offered
to go to Mexico and get the money for a fee. Carillo,
now living in Stockton, said he declined the offer and never went to claim
his money.
He insists that the money is still his. "They took it from our paychecks,"
he said. "They owe all of us."
Part of the oversight problems stemmed from the limited number of Mexican
government officials in the U.S. to monitor contracts
and work sites. "It is impossible for these officials to meet the demands
for their services," concluded a 1945 analysis by the Pan
American Union, now the Organization of American States.
Employers Were to Deduct the Funds
Scholars who have examined the issue say it is not clear that all of the
workers' money made it to Mexico. Under the agreement,
employers were to deduct the funds and forward them to the U.S. government,
along with records showing how much each worker
was owed.
The money was then to be credited to Mexico's Central Bank and sent to
two other financial institutions.
But Mexican banking officials complained that the U.S. was lagging behind
in forwarding the documentation needed to promptly
disburse the savings to workers, according to Mexican news accounts from
the period.
There were numerous accusations of fraud south of the border.
"There have been many cases where the men have been cheated of their savings
on their return to Mexico," the Pan American
Union report said.
One of those who tried to collect was former bracero Magaña. He
says he made inquiries to officials in the Mexican capital in the
mid-1940s but was told they had no information. So he returned to the fields
of California.
"I could have used the money," he said.
Copyright 2000