Guatemala, Belize: Close to ending historic dispute
Guatemala, a Spanish-speaking country of 12 million people, claims Belize's
southern half as part of its territory, citing discrepancies stemming from
a treaty
signed in 1859 with Britain, Belize's colonial ruler until independence
in 1981.
Prior to 1999, Guatemala claimed all of Belize as its own. Its maps still
depict
Belize, an English-speaking strip of Caribbean coast and lowland jungle
with
250,000 people of mostly African descent, as its easternmost province.
Guatemalan rulers over the years have invoked the claim as a rallying cry
during
times of political strife.
In the most recent of numerous violent spats along a porous 125 mile (200
km)
border, Belize soldiers in November shot dead three Guatemalan civilians
on the
Belizean side. Belize claims they acted in self defense after being attacked
with
spear-guns and machetes.
But at the end of a visit to Belize and Guatemala earlier this week, British
Foreign
Office Minister Denis MacShane said Britain and other donors were prepared
to
offer the countries as much as $200 million in development grants if they
can end
the dispute.
Both countries are now optimistic they can soon agree to disagree on their
common
history, and decide on moves to become regional partners. The countries
are
seeking a negotiated solution with the help of the Organization of American
States
(OAS), and conclusions are expected at the end of August.
"Two years ago it was unthinkable that we would sit down at a table and
talk about
this," Guatemalan Foreign Secretary Gabriel Orellana told Reuters in an
interview.
"This is the first time we have ever seen a light at the end of the tunnel."
Said Belizean ambassador to Guatemala Moises Cal in a separate interview:
"We are
very optimistic. There seems now to be a real political will to come to
a political
solution and have this resolved."
Moving Closer
Both suspecting that international law would rule in their favor, the two
countries
have considered attempting to solve the dispute through the Internatio
nal Court of
Justice in The Hague.
That process would cost the poor nations millions of dollars in lawyers'
fees, and
by producing a loser, likely further embitter already rocky relations between
them.
But in a ground-breaking compromise in July 2000, Guatemalan President
Alfonso
Portillo and Belizean Prime Minister Said Musa named two international
"facilitators"
to seek a negotiated solution under the auspices of the OAS.
As part of the negotiations, the countries in December begun joint army
patrols
along the border working together to clamp down on problems such as
drug-trafficking and illegal migration. Since then no violent incidents
have occurred.
For the offer of cash to materialize, said MacShane, Guatemala would have
to fully
recognize Belize as an independent state with an unchallengeable border
and look
upon it as a partner nation.
Britain wants the Guatemala-Belize border to be taken off the international
agenda as
a potential flash point and hopes that an agreement will foster trade links
and greater
cooperation between the two countries.
"We think that's worth spending serious money on," MacShane told Reuters.
Although Belize has repeatedly said it will not cede an inch of territory
to
Guatemala, putting an end to the problem will require concessions on both
sides
that some observers expect will include giving Guatemala access and fishing
rights
in some Belizean maritime areas.
But as Guatemala's constitution states any decision to withdraw the country's
claim
must be approved by referendum, the Guatemalan people will ultimately decide
the
issue.
Older generations of Guatemalans have had the slogan "Belize is ours" drummed
in
to them in school. But those eager for an agreement are hoping younger
people who
make up the majority of Guatemala's population will take a more moderate
view.
Carlos Morales, a 19-year-old Guatemala City street vendor, said he believed
Belize
did rightfully belong to Guatemala but would vote to drop the claim if
it was put to
a vote.
"I think it is ours, but it is an independent state now and getting it
back would be
impossible," he said.
Copyright 2002 Reuters.