GUATEMALA CITY (Reuters) -- Guatemalan voters on Sunday rejected
constitutional reforms that would have granted equal rights to the country's
Maya Indian majority and curtailed army power in the country's first elections
since a 36-year-long civil war ended in 1996.
In what analysts called a severe blow to Guatemala's peace process, partial
results from 21 of Guatemala's 22 provinces showed voters rejecting by
a
2-to-1 margin a package of constitutional reforms aimed at rectifying some
of
the underlying causes of the war.
Electoral officials said voter turnout was running at only about 18.4 percent
of
the 4 million registered voters in this Central America country of 11 million.
No violence was reported.
The reforms would have recognised the rights of Guatemala's indigenous
majority for the first time since Europeans arrived here in the 16th century.
Guatemalans also were asked whether to overhaul the executive, legislative
and judicial branches, and to reshape the Guatemalan army, which was
blamed by a U.N.-monitored truth commission for committing 93 percent of
the massacres, tortures, disappearances and assassinations during the
country's civil war.
A "yes" vote would have allowed for a civilian rather than a military defence
minister and eliminated a covert military intelligence unit.
The referendum was divided into four questions, and of the four, the widest
margin showed the "no" vote ahead 68 percent to 26 percent, or 153,938
votes
to 58,055, on whether to reorganize the legislature.
The closest vote of the four showed "no" ahead 63 percent to 31 percent,
or
144,491 to 72,461, on granting Indian rights.
In a moral victory for backers of the reforms, the "yes" vote led in heavily
Indian provinces like Quiche and Alta Verapaz, which bore the brunt of
wartime violence.
"We recognise democracy," Nineth Montenegro, a congresswoman for
Guatemala's main leftist party and backer of the "yes" vote, said in conceding
defeat.
"But this is a tremendously conservative country," she said. "Once again,
the
racism of Guatemala has been exposed."
Backers of the "no" side said the results supported their call for reforming
the
constitution through a constituent assembly rather than a popular vote.
They
also warned that the reforms would have created a two-tiered legal system
prone to reverse discrimination.
"This confirms our beliefs that the reforms can only be carried out by
calling a
constitutional assembly," Francisco Bianchi, the leader of the conservative
Alliance for Democratic Reconciliation party (ARDE), told Reuters.
The "no" side also said Guatemalans had spoken by giving low marks to the
political parties that engineered the peace process.
The referendum was the first nationwide election since the government and
Marxist guerrillas signed a peace accord in 1996 to end the war, which
killed
an estimated 200,000 people, most of them civilians.
The reforms were approved by Congress under a 1996 peace accord between
the government of President Alvaro Arzu and the Guatemalan National
Revolutionary Unit (URNG), the former guerrillas now registered as a political
party.
Supporters of the "yes" vote -- they included all of Guatemala's main political
parties -- said the outcome would reopen the wounds of Guatemala's bloody
past by preserving the Mayans' status as second-class citizens.
"This means we are returning to the past," said Alvaro Colom, presidential
candidate for the left-of centre coalition Alliance For the New Nation
(ANN).
Copyright 1999 Reuters.