Washington triples fines for traveling to Cuba
• What even ‘El Nuevo Herald,’ voice of Miami’s Cuban American
National Foundation, called an avalanche of U.S. visitors to the island,
has provoked an hysterical but impotent campaign to prevent it
BY GABRIEL MOLINA
SENATOR Byron Dorgan (Democrat from North Dakota), chairman of
the Senate Subcommittee on Treasury Appropriations, revealed that
the number of U.S. citizens fined by the Treasury Department for
traveling to Cuba has almost quadrupled, from 188 in 2000 to 766 in
2001.
He emphatically declared that in an attempt to punish Fidel Castro,
U.S. citizens are being denied their freedom to travel. Dorgan made
these statements at the start of his subcommittee’s hearings on this
subject, which began on February 11 of this year.
In early 2001 the senator tried to include an amendment in the
agricultural appropriations act, permitting financing of food and
medicine sales to Cuba. However, after the tragedy of September
11, Congress decided not to consider the amendment, leaving out all
controversial proposals in order to facilitate budget approval.
The U.S. Senate is analyzing two initiatives that could eliminate parts
of the blockade against Cuba. One bill’s objective is to authorize the
financing of food sales to the island. Such sales have been legal since
Congress approved and President Clinton signed a proposal to "ease
the embargo," with the limitation that the sales would have to be
paid in cash, without any type of public or private financing. The
Cuban government, U.S. farmers and legislators who represent them
and support the bill, all declared that it is impossible to conduct the
sales without financing. However, after Hurricane Michelle, which
struck the island last November, the two governments agreed to a
$30 million USD cash purchase.
Many analysts considered that these sales, although undertaken as
an exceptional measure, were a blow to the blockade and convincing
evidence of what can be done. The possibility of ending the financial
restrictions for the food and medicine sales is now included in a bill
by
Senator Tom Harkin (Democrat from Iowa), chairman of the Senate
Agriculture Committee. The initiative aims to modify the text of the
Trade Sanctions Act by authorizing financing, and has already been
approved by that committee. After the bill is approved on the Senate
floor, it must go to the conference committee, where the two
houses’ different versions of the bill must be reconciled.
The second bill demands the elimination of funds allocated by the
Treasury Department for financing investigations of those who travel
to Cuba. The amendment, attached to the budget bill for various
government entities, including the Treasury Department, could return
to U.S. citizens the freedom to travel to the island.
In the mid-2000, Republican members of Congress joined their
Democratic counterparts, in both legislative bodies, to approve a bill
that would authorize foods and medicine exports, in addition to
travel to Cuba. The proposal had been presented by John Ashcroft,
then a senator from Missouri and now attorney general, and another
representative from the state of Washington, George Nethercutt.
On the night of June 26, 2000, Republican Majority Leader Tom
DeLay, Ileana Ros-Lehtinen and Lincoln Díaz-Balart pressured
Nethercutt to accept the financing and other prohibitions, or they
would scuttle the proposal as they had the previous year. In 1999
another bill had been approved by both the House and the Senate,
but was blocked in a political move by the same personalities and
never taken to the conference committee. Ashcroft denounced the
maneuver as undemocratic, and thus the prohibition on financing was
carried over to the 2000 bill.
OFAC USES FUNDS FOR PREVENTING TERRORISM TO
ENFORCE TRAVEL BAN
In his speech to the subcommittee during the hearing, Senator
Dorgan explained that the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the
Department of Treasury (OFAC) focuses on, among other things, the
pursuit of worldwide financing for terrorism. The government
proposes increasing the budget by $2 million USD in 2003, he added,
and the reason for the hearing is to evaluate what has been
happening with respect to the use of the OFAC funds for the
persecution of U.S. citizens who travel to Cuba.
Dorgan declared that they have received numerous reports about a
dramatic increase in such actions, particularly after September 11.
One wonders, he went on, if reinforcing the restrictions on traveling
to Cuba is the best way of using resources allocated for preventing
terrorist attacks.
He stated that although the objective of the hearing is not political
but to investigate how much of the OFAC’s funding is being used for
that purpose, he expressed his opinion that restrictions on traveling
to Cuba are obsolete.
Dorgan didn’t hide his intentions when considering that the best way
to achieve progress in Cuba is to follow the route taken with the
former Soviet Union and now being taken with China: more
interaction, more travel, more education. He stresses that
people-to-people contact brought about the fall of the Soviet Union
and he thinks that the same effect could be achieved in Cuba. That is
a challenge that the Cuban government will have to face.
He also stated that he would very much like to see farming families
travel to Cuba to sell their produce unimpeded. Congress members
from agricultural states are particularly interested in expanding trade
opportunities for their farmers. As an example, Dorgan mentioned
what happened in January when a 98-strong delegation from the
non-profit Farm Foundation was denied a license to discuss
agricultural business here. This was despite the fact that Clinton’s
secretary of agriculture and two undersecretaries are Foundation
board members.
Research by the Reconciliation and Development Fund revealed that
in 2001, 21 organizations requested licenses to travel to Cuba, in line
with the Clinton administration’s people-to-people policy in 1999 and
its decision to increase the number of licenses. Only six were
approved, and 14 denied.
GROWING REPUDIATION OF ANTI-CUBA MEASURES CREATES
HYSTERIA IN MIAMI
The rise in the number of fines is a consequence of orders by
President Bush, who in July 2001 increased OFAC funding, enabling
that agency to employ more staff in order to better monitor travel to
Cuba. Nevertheless, last year’s visits by some 160,000 U.S. citizens
was the highest since the triumph of the Revolution in 1959.
Wayne Smith, who served as head of the U.S. Interest Section at the
end of the 1970s and resigned because he disagreed with Reagan’s
policies, told the Sun Sentinel on January 15 of this year that travel
controls should end, asserting that these restrictions are the most
objectionable aspect of U.S. sanctions on Cuba.
Smith asks why U.S. farmers cannot trade freely with Cuba, as they
do with China and Viet Nam. His answer: according to the Bush
administration’s calculations, U.S. farmers’ interests aren’t being
taken into account because of the need to guarantee the votes of
South Florida’s Cuban-American lobby. He noted that putting aside
the economic interests of the majority to meet the special interests
of a small group is pretty bad, but if U.S. citizens’ constitutional right
to travel is also being denied for that reason, it’s even worse.
The emotional temperature among South Florida’s Cubans is so high
that Glenn Garvin, TV critic for The Miami Herald, a daily that is
known for its frequently servile ties to that sector, published an
article on February 19 entitled "CNN’s tips for visiting Cuba cross the
line." He wrote, "In a bold bid for the all-important Felons Aged
21-55 ratings demographic, the heads of the CNN Headline News
offered a detailed primer on how to travel to Cuba illegally." The
feature was anchored by Robin Meade, who talked with an
Atlanta-based travel consultant Chris McGinnis, who regularly
contributes travel pieces to the network.
McGinnis first explained how to visit the island legally, admitting
[according to Garvin] that "it isn’t easy, since the U.S. government
generally only approves trips for officials, journalists, athletes
competing in a specific event or those with close family members
living in Cuba."
According to Garvin, McGinnis then advised how to avoid the legal
path and travel through a third country — Nassau in the Bahamas;
various Mexican cities; Toronto, Canada; or Montego Bay.
"I’ve been watching television for more than 40 years," stated
Garvin, "but this was the first time I’d ever seen a network provide a
detailed blueprint on how to violate the law." He speculated whether
CNN "plans further features on how to freebase cocaine, cheat on
your taxes or smuggle a box cutter onto an airplane”
"It’s illegal for Americans to visit North Korea, too, but I guarantee
that CNN will never do a how-to piece on Pyongyang. Just as I can
guarantee that Ted Turner will never travel there to duck hunting with
Kim Jong Il," although he did with Fidel Castro.
The annoyed critic turned himself into the spokesman for the Cuban
American National Foundation and, inspired by the old tyrannical style
of Batista followers, also attacked famous news anchorman Dan
Rather – for "escorting [Fidel] to his limousine and calling out,
‘Goodbye, Mr. President, take care!’" – and CBS President Les
Moonves – because he went to Havana last year "for four days of
partying and came back with Castro’s autograph on a cigar box."
And he insulted ABC’s Barbara Walters for having once helped Fidel to
arrange a dinner for powerful executives from Time, Newsweek,
ABC, NPR, The Washington Post and other "elite news media."
With a vengeful air, as if he himself had been wounded, he
threateningly concluded that in his next column he would provide
detailed instructions on how to watch CNN’s satellite broadcasts
without paying for them, while clearly saying that this is illegal.