Elian Gonzalez, 6, looks at journalists
taking his picture Wednesday during a
brief car trip away from his relatives'
home in the Miami area.
For now, Elian’s fate is in the hands of the U.S.
Immigration and Naturalization Service. Its rules say the
boy’s father must have the chance to prove he is actually the
parent and say whether he wants his son back. And, while
cases like this are rare, U.S. officials say, the parent’s
wishes are generally followed.
Late Wednesday, the U.S. State Department cabled a
diplomatic note to the U.S. mission in Havana, and it was
then taken to the Cuban Foreign Ministry. State Department
spokesman James Foley said earlier in the day that the note
would outline the procedures by which Juan Miguel
Gonzalez, the boy’s father, could ask for Elian’s return.
But according to Castro, the father said he would not
meet with U.S. officials unless they are prepared to tell him
when the child will be brought home.
Castro’s comments came in a letter read during a
demonstration Wednesday night outside the U.S. mission in
Havana.
CASTRO SEEKS ‘HONORABLE’ DEAL
“His reaction is fair,” Castro said, referring to the boy’s
father, but the Cuban leader also called for “a honorable
and dignified formula” to be sought by both sides. Castro
said he had been waiting all day to hear from U.S. officials
about the case, but had not.
It was not immediately clear whether the INS would
find the father’s position untenable, or whether it was
possible some sort of intermediary could be used to
establish paternity to the U.S. agency’s satisfaction.
Castro also said that Juan Miguel Gonzalez had been
offered $2 million by what he called the “extremist
Cuban-American mafia” to move to Miami and stay with
Elian there.
Castro’s comments were contained in a letter read to
tens of thousands of protesters Wednesday night in Havana.
RHETORIC LEVEL CALMER
Castro also used the letter to repeat that he did not
intend to humiliate the United States and that “we have not
formulated an ultimatum.”
Both sides in the conflict appeared Wednesday to be
trying to lower the volume.
Asked about the controversy at a news conference,
U.S. President Bill Clinton sidestepped the issue, saying
there was a legal process to be followed, and the case
should be resolved without “politics or threats.” He said he
sympathized with a father trying to get his son back, but
added the the highest concern was “what is best for the
child.”
Clinton said officials in both nations should “try to take
as much political steam out of it as possible” for the child’s
sake.
And Cuban officials said Castro was misunderstood
when he said last weekend that the boy had to be returned
within 72 hours — in other words by Wednesday. They
said it was just a “figure of speech” — and advice, not a
deadline.
LEGAL DECISIONS
On Tuesday night, Elian briefly spoke to reporters for
the first time, encouraged to do so by his Miami relatives,
who asked him if he wanted to stay in the United States.
“I want to stay,” he responded, and then whispered
“yes” when asked if he liked it in Miami.
The boy’s father, called by The Miami Herald for a
reaction to Elian’s comments, countered: “That’s not what
he tells me on the phone. ... They are forcing him to say
that.”
An attorney representing Elian’s relatives said
Wednesday the family plans to file a petition for political
asylum on the boy’s behalf.
Elian is considered legally too young to make his own
decisions, but the law points toward one outcome.
Under the law in Florida — or any other U.S. state —
the wishes of a child’s parents get the most legal weight.
Legal experts say the boy’s relatives in Miami would
have little legal recourse in a state courtroom to stop the
INS process.
“Courts will almost always determine that the best
interest of a child lies in being with an actual biological or
adopted parent, and not in being with a great aunt or great
uncle who happens to live a more prosperous life in a freer
place,” said David Abraham, professor at the University of
Miami.
Even so, a lawyer for the relatives said it is worth a try.
“We feel that young Elian would be in danger in Cuba,” said
Spencer Eig. “We feel that it would not be in his best
interest in Cuba.”
CONCESSIONS ON BOTH SIDES
NBC’s Andrea Mitchell, reporting from Havana
Wednesday, said Cuban officials were “encouraged” by
State Department positions on two fronts: that the United
States recognized the father’s right to assert his custody
claim, and that it planned to return to Cuba six people
suspected of hijacking a boat with two hostages last
Monday.
However, that plan could go awry if prosecutors
decide to try them in the United States. A spokeswoman for
the U.S. attorney’s office in Miami said the matter was still
pending.
The controversy has unfolded as both countries
prepare for a new round of bilateral immigration talks on
Monday in Havana.
The president of Cuba’s National Assembly, Ricardo
Alarcon, warned that Havana might cancel the next round if
the boy were not returned.
The talks are part of a 1994 bilateral agreement that
sought to stem the illegal refugee flow from Cuba. That
summer, more than 35,000 rafters risked their lives crossing
the Florida Straits before the two governments signed the
accord.
NEW RAFTER FLOOD UNLIKELY
While the scheduling of those talks remained uncertain
on Wednesday, senior intelligence officials have told NBC
News that they do not expect Cuba to permit rafters to
leave Cuba in large numbers.
“The 1995 immigration agreement works well for
(Castro),” said one official, speaking on condition of
anonymity. “It gives him a safety valve that reduces the
internal threat to his regime. It provides him with legal
justifications to make certain requests of the U.S. We don’t
see him abrogating this.”
The United States and Cuba have held the talks every
six months since signing the agreement, which seeks to stop
often-treacherous illegal immigration from the island. It
allows 20,000 Cubans a year to immigrate through legal
channels and calls on the United States to repatriate illegal
Cuban immigrants picked up at sea.