The Washington Post
December 9, 1999
 
 
Clinton Warns Against Politics in Cuban Boy's Case

                  By Steven Mufson
                  Washington Post Staff Writer
                  Thursday, December 9, 1999; Page A41

                  The tug-of-war over a 6-year-old Cuban boy who survived a disastrous
                  boat trip to Florida should be settled by "what would be best for the child,"
                  President Clinton said yesterday. But an influential Cuban American
                  organization said the boy should remain with relatives in Florida and
                  warned the administration against "playing into [Cuban leader Fidel]
                  Castro's hands."

                  In Havana, thousands of people--including many students in their school
                  uniforms--demonstrated for the fourth straight day in front of the building
                  that houses the U.S. diplomatic interests section along the city's oceanfront
                  boulevard, the Malecon.

                  The boy, Elian Gonzalez, has literally become a poster child for the
                  politically charged issue of U.S.-Cuban relations since he was found Nov.
                  25 clinging to an inner tube off the Florida coast. His mother and stepfather
                  had died after a powerboat loaded with 14 people sank during an attempt
                  to reach the United States.

                  In Miami, the Cuban American National Foundation has printed posters of
                  Elian lying on a stretcher, depicting him as a victim of communist
                  repression. But in Havana, his picture has been plastered on one of two
                  large billboards opposite the U.S. interests section, with the slogan "Return
                  Elian to his country." The other billboard has a picture of Elian's empty
                  school desk and the caption, "Send Elian back to his classroom."

                  Since his rescue, the boy has been staying with his father's uncle and
                  cousins--one of whom arrived from Cuba just four months ago--pending a
                  Dec. 23 hearing of the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS).

                  Faced with the street demonstrations in Havana and demands from Cuban
                  American groups that the boy be allowed to stay in Florida, Clinton tried
                  to keep out of the fray.

                  "The question is--and I think the most important thing is--what would be
                  best for the child. And there is a legal process for determining that," he said
                  at a White House news conference. "I don't think that politics or threats
                  should have anything to do with it, and if I have my way, it won't."

                  The Cuban American National Foundation, a strongly anti-Castro
                  organization, said the United States should insist that Cuba allow the boy's
                  father, his sole surviving parent, to travel to Florida to make a decision free
                  from political pressure.

                  "We have said from the beginning that the only hostage here is the boy's
                  father, who is not being allowed by the Cuban government to come to the
                  United States and make a decision about whether the boy stays or goes,
                  without any pressure from the Cuban government," said Ninoska Perez, a
                  spokeswoman for the group.

                  In Havana, Castro said last night that the father of the boy had told him that
                  he was not interested in traveling to the United States or in speaking with a
                  U.S. government representative in Cuba unless it was to "communicate the
                  day, hour and means" of the child's return.

                  In his most extensive comments since the boy was rescued, Castro said, in
                  a statement read by a student leader at last night's demonstration in the
                  Cuban capital, that he has "no desire to humiliate the United States" and
                  was not issuing an ultimatum. But, he said, Cuba's "irritation and
                  indignation" would not be assuaged until the child is returned.

                  Cuba has charged that the U.S. failure to return Elian to his father violates
                  an accord signed in 1994 to halt illegal migration to the United States, and
                  the government in Havana has vowed to keep demonstrations going until
                  the boy is repatriated. Yesterday, the protest featured salsa music, a
                  popular singer of children's songs, dancing, speeches and people holding
                  signs saying "We love you, Elian" and "We're waiting for you, Elian."

                  Formally, the Cuban government also has sent the United States a
                  diplomatic note demanding Elian's return; the State Department said it will
                  reply by today and promised to outline the father's rights and the
                  procedures he can use to request his son's return.

                  The State Department said the INS will contact the boy's father, Juan
                  Miguel Gonzalez, who works as a hotel doorman in Veradero, Cuba's
                  main beach resort east of Havana. Spokesman James Foley added that if
                  the father wants to go to Florida, the United States will issue him a visa,
                  but it remains unclear whether the Cuban government would allow him to
                  leave. U.S. legal experts said that the father also could agree to let others
                  represent him in the United States.

                  If the INS rules that the boy should be returned to Cuba, relatives in
                  Florida can challenge the INS determination in court.

                  "We should let the people who are responsible for this, who have a legal
                  responsibility, try to do the right thing by the child," said Clinton. "These
                  decisions are often difficult even in domestic situations, and--but I hope
                  that is what will be done, and it should be done without regard to politics."

                  "It's a curious intersection of immigration and family law," said David A.
                  Martin, a professor of law at the University of Virginia and former INS
                  general counsel. Under a 1966 special immigration law, people who make
                  it to U.S. shores from Cuba can receive permission for permanent
                  residence after one year. But under family law, the father would usually get
                  custody.

                  Though Clinton said it wasn't his decision, Martin said there is a precedent
                  for high-level action: During the Reagan administration, then-Attorney
                  General Edwin Meese issued a "departure control order" that enabled a
                  minor--a 12-year-old Ukrainian--to remain in the United States against the
                  will of his parents, who were returning to the Soviet Union. "I think this is
                  one that should go to the family court," Martin said.

                  "It's very straightforward and simple," said Bernard Perlmutter, director of
                  the Children and Youth Law Clinic at the University of Miami Law School.
                  "The right of the child is to be raised by a parent." But, he noted, "this is a
                  case that is extremely complex not so much because of the custodial
                  question, but because of the political ramifications."

                  Staff writer Karen DeYoung contributed to this report from Havana.

                           © Copyright 1999 The Washington Post Company