Carter surprisingly uninformed
BY ROBERT NOVAK SUN-TIMES COLUMNIST
Jimmy Carter in Cuba tenaciously pressed George W. Bush to end the U.S.
embargo, while more gently urging democratization on Fidel Castro. What
disrupted the former president's plan was talk that the Cuban dictator
may be
developing biological warfare weapons for rogue nations. An irritated Carter
blamed the Bush administration for raising the issue.
In and out of office, Carter has ignored facts that disturb his world view.
In Cuba
last week, he accepted Castro's word that Cuba is not developing bioweapons.
What's more, he prompted an attack on a conservative State Department official
for even suggesting it.
Actually, Cuban capability for biowarfare was determined by the CIA and
approved for public consumption. That conflicts with Castro's charm offensive
and congressional efforts to admit Communist Cuba to the family of respectable
nations. Carter and other advocates of normalization must ignore Castro's
ties
with rogue nations, connections with international drug trafficking and
previous
use of forbidden weapons. In January 1989, my late partner, Rowland Evans,
and I exposed evidence of Cuban troops in Angola using poison gas.
A week before Carter's Cuba visit, Undersecretary of State John Bolton
in a
speech to the conservative Heritage Foundation suggested Cuba possesses
bio-war potential and has supplied technology to ''other rogue nations.''
Touring the Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology in Havana,
Carter
informed Castro that ''on more than one occasion'' he was told by ''our
experts in
intelligence'' there was no evidence to back up Bolton.
Bolton then came under withering attack as a radical rightist deviating
from the
Bush administration line. In fact, he is a distinguished member of the
conservative movement. A Washington lawyer, he served as an assistant
secretary of state and assistant attorney general in previous Republican
administrations before becoming senior vice president of the American
Enterprise Institute. His nomination to head arms control and international
security in the State Department was delayed for two months by Senate
Democrats on grounds of ''philosophy'' and ''temperament.'' He finally
was
confirmed, 50-43.
In mid-February this year, Bolton asked the intelligence community for
an
assessment of Cuba and bioweapons. CIA analysts produced a brief summary,
which was then approved as official U.S. government doctrine. However,
Bolton
had no immediate use for the material. There the matter stood until Carl
Ford,
assistant secretary of state for Intelligence, on March 19 testified to
the Senate
Foreign Relations Committee about chemical and biological weapons.
Unknown to Bolton, Ford read, word for word, the government- approved
language that had been drafted in response to Bolton: ''The United States
believes that Cuba has at least a limited developmental offensive biological
warfare research and development effort. Cuba has provided dual-use
biotechnology to rogue states. We are concerned that such technology could
support BW [biological warfare] programs in those states. We call on Cuba
to
cease all BW-applicable cooperation with rogue states.''
Carter is the only former president with his own foreign policy think tank
(the
Carter Center in Atlanta). It is, therefore, astonishing that he could
have been
unaware of Ford's testimony and learned of the U.S. intelligence assessment
only from Bolton two months later. When Secretary of State Colin Powell
was
asked about Bolton's comments during an airborne press conference en route
home from Iceland, he replied: ''This is not a new statement.''
Two leaders trying to normalize relations with Castro--Sen. Christopher
Dodd,
chairman of the Western Hemisphere subcommittee, and his staffer Janice
O'Connell--pushed for a quick hearing targeting Bolton in the dock. He
was
unavailable (in Moscow to prepare for the summit), but he still deserves
a
chance to repudiate the canard that he was free-lancing. Indeed, Jimmy
Carter
might well be requested to name his ''experts in intelligence'' who allegedly
contradicted the U.S. government's position.