Peru challenger boycotts runoff, claiming fraud
BY LUCIEN O. CHAUVIN
Special to The Herald
LIMA, Peru -- Presidential candidate Alejandro Toledo announced
Thursday that
he would not participate in the May 28 runoff election against
President Alberto
Fujimori, who has been accused of trying to commit electoral
fraud in an
unprecedented effort to win a third consecutive term in office.
Toledo said conditions do not exist for free and fair elections
at the moment and
demanded a postponement of at least three weeks.
``We have asked the National Election Board to postpone the elections
to June
18, which will allow for a runoff election in much more equitable
conditions,''
Toledo said. ``We will not participate in the elections set for
May 28.''
He added that the extension he is requesting does not mean that
he will definitely
run in June. He said he ``will not participate in any fraudulent
electoral process.''
Toledo's announcement came only hours after the Organization of
American
States election observer mission in Lima gave the government
an ultimatum to
address ``insufficiencies, irregularities, inconsistencies and
inequities'' in the
electoral process. The mission said that if the government did
not solve a list of
problems by Monday, it would lose OAS support.
The failure to win the endorsement of the OAS would represent
a major setback
to Fujimori's efforts to regain a measure of credibility as a
democratic statesman.
Ever since he engineered a so-called ``self-coup'' in 1992, abolishing
Congress
and writing a new constitution to allow presidential reelection,
his democratic
credentials have been widely questioned, both domestically and
internationally.
Toledo's sudden decision to withdraw also throws the Peruvian
political process
into chaos. Without a viable candidate to compete against --
even one who took
himself out of the race -- Fujimori's reelection would be seen
by many as a
charade.
Toledo said keeping Peru free from political tension is up to Fujimori.
``I hope that President Fujimori and Peru 2000 [the president's
campaign
movement] have the courage not to allow the country to be pushed
to the razor's
edge and a climate of political instability,'' he declared.
BEST SCENARIO
Eduardo Stein, former Guatemalan foreign minister and head of
the OAS mission,
said the best possible scenario would be postponing the elections
because his
group did not have time to verify the different components of
the election.
Fujimori, addressing a massive campaign rally in the southeastern
city of
Ayacucho on Thursday, dismissed accusations of fraud and said
the vote would
proceed as scheduled. ``We will go to the polls on May 28. No
one is going to
change the will of the people,'' he said.
He made the comments hours before Toledo withdrew from the race.
With the scheduled balloting only 10 days away, Peruvians remain
evenly divided
between the two candidates, with recently nationwide polls giving
each man 46
percent support.
Toledo began threatening to withdraw from the race in the days
immediately after
the first round of voting.
In the first round, April 9, Toledo received 40.15 percent of
the votes compared
with 49.89 percent for Fujimori. The president came up only 15,000
votes short of
winning the presidency and avoiding a runoff.
MAINTAINS FRAUD
Toledo, a 54-year-old, U.S.-trained economics professor, has maintained
that
Fujimori's near victory was the product of fraud and demanded
that the conditions
for the second round change radically.
Among the key issues are government control of access to the media,
the use of
state funds to finance Fujimori's campaign and manipulation of
the electoral
agency's software to ensure a third term for the president.
While the first two problems are troubling -- government spending
in March, for
example, increased 26 percent over the previous year; and while
Fujimori's rally
was carried on state television, Toledo's press conference was
not -- it's the issue
of the computer system that has Toledo and the election observers
doubting the
possibility of fair elections May 28.
In the first round of voting, the computer system registered more
than one million
more votes than voters, and the number of votes for some opposition
parties
actually went down as the number of ballots counted increased.
The National
Electoral Processes Office agreed to implement a new system in
the face of
international pressure.
NOT ENOUGH TIME
Stein says his team needs at least three weeks to verify the election
agency's
new computer system. As of Thursday, the OAS had yet to receive
a complete
copy of the software, and Stein said it's ``technically impossible
to audit the new
computer program'' in the time remaining before the vote.
Percy Media, a representative of the local election-monitoring
group
Transparency, says at least 80 percent of the observers' recommendations
to
improve the computer software ``have not been met.''
Luis Nuñes, head of the Carter Center-National Democratic
Institute team in Peru,
says any change in the date of the election depends on the political
will of the two
parties.
``If both parties agree that postponing the election would improve
the process,
particularly the technical aspects, then I think the election
board will listen. The
election board needs to break out of its straitjacket and consider
different
options,'' Nuñes said.
Fujimori's supporters dismiss the need to postpone the elections.
Francisco Tudela, Fujimori's vice-presidential candidate, says
Toledo's backers
are acting like spoiled children, trying to see how far they
can push the limits.
``They remind me of little boys who poke a stick into the spokes
of a bicycle to
see what might happen,'' he said.