Mexican senator takes secrets of massacre to his grave
MORRIS THOMPSON
Herald World Staff
MEXICO CITY -- A lot of people expressed grief when Fernando Gutiérrez
Barrios
died recently of a heart attack at age 73, but not necessarily
because they
admired him.
Gutiérrez, a federal senator from the ruling Institutional
Revolutionary Party when
he died, was the head of Mexico's secret police when government
troops killed
several hundred unarmed student protesters in a Mexico City plaza
on the eve of
the 1968 Summer Olympics here.
REAL STORY
The real story of the Tlatelolco Massacre, named after the site
of the incident,
may be the biggest mystery in Mexico's recent past, but it is
only one of many
crucial events that have never been cleared up. As the years
pass, Mexicans fear
that others who know the secret history of Mexico will take their
secrets to the
grave.
Gutiérrez Barrios continued to run Mexico's secret-police
agency, the now
disbanded Federal Security Directorate, for many years afterward,
and many
Mexicans say he directed a little-known ``Dirty War'' in the
1970s, in which
perhaps 1,500 leftists and suspected leftists were killed and
another 600 or so
disappeared.
Rosário Ibarra, founder of a group of families of the disappeared,
said she was
sorry that Gutiérrez died just as Vicente Fox has become
this country's first
president from outside the PRI since 1928, because she hopes
Fox will press to
uncover the hidden history of Mexico's political life. Fox was
elected after
promising to bring honesty and accountability to Mexico's government.
Many
Mexicans expect that to include finding the answers to nagging
questions about
controversial events during the PRI's long reign, when the rich
and powerful were
seen as accountable to no one. That may not be easy, especially
if records prove
to be sparse, and bureaucrats and former officials are reluctant
to tell what they
know.
One of the common elements in all the unsolved mysteries is that
many
Mexicans remain unconvinced by official accounts of what happened.
Among
them:
When PRI presidential nominee Luis Donaldo Colósio
was killed at a campaign
stop in Tijuana in 1994, the official investigation concluded
the gunman acted
alone. The suspicion that the anti-reform wing of the PRI conspired
to have
Colósio killed remains popular, however.
After Roman Catholic Cardinal Juan Jesús Posadas
Ocampo was gunned down
at the Guadalajara airport in 1993, officials said drug dealers
had mistaken his car
for that of one of their rivals. Posadas' successor said he thought
there was a plot
against the prelate, who was outspoken about the need for more
democracy and
less corruption, including in the war against drugs.
FEDERAL BUDGET
As a bank bailout in the mid-1990s mounted to $100 billion
in a country whose
annual federal budget is about half that, the government said
it had acted merely
to save the financial system from collapse. Then came revelations
that individual
PRI supporters had gotten loans they never repaid. A full accounting
of who
received loans and why has never been made.
As for the Tlatelolco Massacre, the questions abound: How many
were really
killed? Who ordered the indiscriminate shooting? Why? Luis Echeverría,
Gutiérrez
Barrios' direct supervisor as minister of the interior, went
on to become president
in 1970, and many believe that he was the key figure in the event.
But his role has
never been cleared up and he has always denied responsibility.
Fox has promised Mexicans they will get an accounting for the
mysteries of the
past, but has also said that Mexico's Congress will have to decide
exactly how to
provide one. Political analysts say PRI loyalists who don't want
the past
excavated and remain a power in the legislature could fight back
by giving Fox
trouble with other parts of his legislative and governing agenda.
Fox named Mariclaire Acosta Urquidi, who's on leave as president
of the
respected nongovernmental National Commission for the Defense
and Promotion
of Human Rights, his special ambassador for human rights and
democracy.
"This new government has an obligation to help find these answers
from the
past,'' she said in an interview. ``I don't think there has been
a real transition to
real democracy anywhere in the world that hasn't come to terms
with its past.''
She said proposals under consideration include something like
the Truth and
Reconciliation Commission used by South Africa after apartheid
ended. As in
South Africa, the panel could require people to testify, with
the condition that they
would not be prosecuted for what they admitted. Such an effort
is under way in
Chile.
"These matters are disparate on the surface, but they're part
of the same process
of impunity [that is, not holding the powerful or rich responsible
for their actions]
that had been happening to other people for a long time,'' Acosta
said. "What
was different in `93 and `94 [the Posadas and Colosio assassinations]
was that
the victims [were] prominent members of the church hierarchy
and of the political
system.''
Acosta said she thinks a similar lack of accountability helps
explain complicity
with corruption.
``It's a systemic phenomenon,'' she said. ``This was a whole system
that was
created on the basis of impunity.''