U.S. migration policy doesn't deter treacherous journeys
Cuban smuggling on rise
BY JAY WEAVER
Lost in the custody clash over Elian Gonzalez is the dangerous
trade of
smuggling Cubans to the United States.
The 6-year-old Cuban boy could be the illegal industry's poster
child. Elian lost
his mother, stepfather and nine others when their boat capsized
in the Straits of
Florida during Thanksgiving week. The only lucky survivors in
this suspected
smuggling operation were two other adults and Elian, who was
miraculously
rescued from an inner tube by fishermen.
The boy is now caught in an extraordinary custody dispute between
his Cuban
father, who wants him returned home, and his Miami relatives,
who want to keep
him here. But U.S. diplomats are not expected to bring up Elian
or alien
smuggling when they meet with their Cuban counterparts Monday
in Havana to
talk about migration agreements.
Migrant smuggling, however, will undoubtedly hover over the talks.
``Alien smuggling is the toothache in [U.S. migration] policy,''
said a State
Department official who did not want to be identified. ``It doesn't
kill you, but it
nags you. It's like when you make a law, and the criminals figure
out a way to get
around it.''
An increasing number of Cubans are expected to make the treacherous
trip
across the Straits of Florida, mostly in smuggling operations,
U.S. Coast Guard
and Border Patrol officials predict.
The phenomenon is a byproduct of U.S. migration policy with roots
in the rafter
crisis of 1994.
That year, more than 37,000 Cuban migrants were intercepted at
sea -- with most
held in a huge refugee city at the U.S. Naval Base at Guantanamo
Bay, Cuba. To
stop the flow, the United States made a commitment to grant at
least 20,000
visas annually to Cubans. The following year, the Clinton administration
also
agreed to return refugees picked up at sea -- unless they could
prove they had a
``well-founded fear of persecution'' in Cuba.
NUMBERS SWELL
The unprecedented migration accords worked, for a while. Just
1,400 Cuban
migrants were intercepted at sea from 1995 to 1997. But last
year, illegal
smuggling took hold after federal officials began allowing migrants
who reached
U.S. soil to apply for residency.
Those who make it to shore can change their status from ``wet-foot''
to ``dry-foot''
aliens, qualifying for residency under the Cuban Adjustment Act.
That law was
adopted in 1966 to accommodate hundreds of thousands of Cubans
who fled
Castro's revolution.
With the dry-foot policy and adjustment act on their side, the
number of Cubans
who reached U.S. shore totaled 2,048 this year -- more than double
last year's
total of 916. An estimated 80 percent were believed smuggled
across.
Cubans on both sides of the straits routinely plot smuggling operations
in small,
fast boats that can sometimes elude the Coast Guard. But the
smugglers, trying
to maximize profit by charging $1,000 to $5,000 a head, often
overload their craft,
with little thought given to safety.
COMMUNITY CONCERN
U.S. Border Patrol spokesman Dan Geoghegan compared these illegal
operations
to drug smuggling, but stressed that enforcement is more difficult
because of
sympathetic Cuban exiles in Miami.
``This is a difficult line of work in a nearly impossible environment,''
Geoghegan
said. ``The community has little tolerance for immigration enforcement,
because it
has such a large concentration of foreign nationals.''
The enforcement issue blew up in the face of the Coast Guard last
June during a
notorious episode known as the ``Surfside Six.''
Trying to get six Cuban migrants to turn themselves in off Surfside
Beach, Coast
Guard crews opened up fire hoses on the rafters' boat. Once the
Cubans had
scattered in the surf, the Coast Guard moved their vessels to
block the swimmers
from making a dash for shore. A Coast Guard crewman pepper-sprayed
one
migrant who was treading water.
The confrontation was aired prominently again and again on TV
news, giving the
Coast Guard a big black eye.
POLICY DEBATE
While the Surfside Six incident was not an organized smuggling
operation, it
nonetheless highlighted the wet-foot, dry-foot policy that seems
to fuel the
smuggling trade.
It also prompted a lawsuit and fiery debate.
In August, Francisco Abreu sued the U.S. government in an effort
to force it to
stop repatriating Cuban nationals to their homeland once they
get within the
12-mile limit of U.S. territorial waters.
Abreu's wife and child were intercepted at sea by the Coast Guard
and returned to
Cuba. He had planned to seek asylum for them when they reached
the United
States.
The federal government asked U.S. District Judge William Hoeveler
to dismiss his
suit and asylum claim. The judge has yet to make a decision.
Max Castro, a senior research associate at the University of Miami's
Dante B.
Fascell North-South Center, said Abreu's legal challenge to the
U.S. repatriation
policy is not the answer.
He said the United States should treat migrants who reach land
the same way as
those intercepted at sea. In other words, if dry-foot aliens
cannot qualify for
political asylum, they also should be returned to Cuba.
``Otherwise, you are promoting the smuggling business, inviting
these dangerous
journeys and provoking these confrontations between the refugees
and Coast
Guard,'' Castro said. ``There shouldn't be two standards based
on who has the
fastest boat.''
Jaime Suchlicki, director of the University of Miami's Institute
for Cuban and
Cuban-American Studies, agrees with his UM colleague that U.S.
migration
policy has flaws. But he stopped short of recommending an end
to the dry-foot
policy and adjustment act.
``I can't accept the idea of sending someone back who is trying
to reach the
United States,'' Suchlicki said. ``The status quo is not fine,
but I don't see how
this can be refined.''