GOP mulls ending birthright citizenship
By Stephen Dinan
House Republicans are looking closely at ending birthright citizenship
and building a barrier along the entire U.S.-Mexico border as they search
for solutions to illegal immigration.
A task force of party leaders and members active
on immigration has met since the summer to try to figure out where consensus
exists, and several participants said those two ideas have floated to the
top of the list of possibilities to be included either in an immigration-enforcement
bill later this year or in a later comprehensive immigration overhaul.
"There is a general agreement about the fact that
citizenship in this country should not be bestowed on people who are the
children of folks who come into this country illegally," said Rep. Tom
Tancredo, Colorado Republican, who is participating in the "unity dinners,"
the group of Republicans trying to find consensus on immigration.
Birthright citizenship, or what critics call "anchor
babies," means that any child born on U.S. soil is granted citizenship,
with exceptions for foreign diplomats. That attracts illegal aliens, who
have children in the United States; those children later can sponsor their
parents for legal immigration.
Most lawmakers had avoided the issue, fearing that
change would require a constitutional amendment -- the 14th Amendment reads
in part: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject
to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States."
But several Republicans said recent studies suggest
otherwise.
"There's been recent scholarship that says we can
do it by statute, and we ought to try," said Rep. Jeff Flake, Arizona Republican,
who usually finds himself on the opposite side of immigration issues from
Mr. Tancredo.
"How in the world can you explain that's a good
policy to have? It simply doesn't promote respect for the rule of law,"
Mr. Flake said.
Several lawmakers said the U.S. and Mexico are the
only major Western countries to have birthright citizenship. Most European
countries have moved away from birthright citizenship in recent decades.
"I am as surprised as anyone that this thing has
got legs," Mr. Tancredo said, adding that he views it as a major step forward
for the immigration debate. "This is the issue that motivated me to deal
with immigration."
While some members said it could be part of an immigration
bill later this year, Rep. Dan Lungren, California Republican, said it
will take longer to drum up public support for such a major change, though
he backs ending the policy.
"Some of us believe we have depreciated the value
of citizenship," he said.
Meanwhile, the idea of a fence or other barrier
also is gaining support.
At this week's "unity dinner," House Speaker J.
Dennis Hastert, Illinois Republican, said he supports a barrier system
of fences in some places and electronic surveillance or vehicle barriers
in others, one participant said.
Mr. Hastert's spokesman said the speaker would not
talk about the private meetings.
Border barriers received a big boost yesterday when
Rep. Duncan Hunter, California Republican and chairman of the Armed Services
Committee, announced a broad enforcement bill with a fence as its centerpiece.
"The fence works," Mr. Hunter said. He led the fight
earlier in this Congress to complete a 14-mile section of fence near San
Diego, and he and other members said the success there gives the idea momentum.
"Those who say the fence won't work, frankly, don't
have experience with fences," said Rep. Geoff Davis, a Kentucky Republican
who is supporting Mr. Hunter's bill.
But Mr. Flake and fellow Arizona Republican Rep.
Jim Kolbe, who both support legalizing illegal aliens and raising legal
immigration levels by 400,000 per year, said a fence would not work.
Mr. Flake said it would not affect those illegal
aliens -- about half of the total immigrant population -- who came to the
United States on legal temporary visas and have overstayed. He also said
he does not want it to sap energy from a comprehensive solution.
"My fear is people will say let's build a fence
and put off any guest-worker, border enforcement, interior enforcement
for years," he said.
Rep. John Shadegg, the Arizona Republican who runs
the dinners, said they are reaching some areas of consensus, though he
would not specify and said committee chairmen would have to write the eventual
bill.
But he said the effort has convinced the White House
to do more to enforce the borders -- something he said was reflected both
in President Bush's remarks upon signing the homeland security spending
bill and in congressional testimony by the Homeland Security secretary.
Mr. Shadegg said the group has talked about border
barriers and electronic surveillance, and said he is a fan of using unmanned
aerial vehicles to patrol the border, particularly because they can track
criminal behavior, which is crucial in establishing a chain of evidence
to convict drug or alien smugglers.