By LARRY ROHTER
PORT-AU-PRINCE, Haiti -- Columbus stumbled across it in 1504 but never
bothered to
come back, and later explorers scorned it as a worthless outcropping of
rock and bird dung.
All of a sudden,
though, the United States and Haiti are squabbling over the status of Navassa,
an
uninhabited
Caribbean island barely two miles square that both countries claim as their
own.
The dispute,
which Haiti is threatening to take to international tribunals, arose after
an American
scientific expedition
authorized by the Interior Department spent two weeks on the island this
summer. The
group returned with tales of finding "biological riches unimagined," which
led Interior
Secretary Bruce
Babbitt to warn of his intention to protect the island from interlopers
-- with Coast
Guard vessels
if necessary.
"If you were
going to consider a system of protected areas, you'd definitely want to
include Navassa
in the portfolio,"
said Michael Smith, leader of the expedition, which was sponsored by the
Center
for Marine Conservation,
a Washington-based environmental group.
"Navassa has
a very special and extremely healthy coral reef," he added, "and it is
absolutely
remarkable how
much animal life we found there, including new species that are endemic
to the
island."
The United States
has controlled Navassa, just 40 miles off Haiti's southwest peninsula,
for more
than 140 years.
But of the 24 constitutions Haiti has had since gaining independence from
France in
1804, all but
one of them described La Navase, as the island is called here, as an inalienable
part of
Haitian territory.
The basis of
the American claim is the Guano Islands Act of 1856, which authorized American
vessels to establish
sovereignty on any abandoned or unclaimed island that had reserves of the
rich
fertilizer derived
from bird droppings. A year later, an American sea captain, Peter Duncan,
planted
the American
flag on Navassa, which was followed by several decades of phosphate mining
and
construction
of a Coast Guard lighthouse that was abandoned only in the 1950s.
Today, Navassa
"is unorganized American territory, meaning that Congress has never set
up or
passed any statutes
prescribing any particular type of administration," Babbitt said in a telephone
interview from
Washington. "In the absence of that, the Interior Department is traditionally
the place
where these
matters are dealt with."
Babbitt declined
to comment on Haiti's claim to the island, referring the matter to the
State
Department,
which has consistently claimed American sovereignty for the Island. "I'm
just the head
gamekeeper around
here," he said. "My job is to administer the place and protect the coral
reefs,
and that's what
we're doing."
But he did add
that he regards Navassa's legal status as no different from that of several
uninhabited
islands in the
Pacific that the United States administers, including Howland and Midway
Islands.
But Foreign Minister
Fritz Longchamp of Haiti rejects the notion that Navassa is American territory
of any sort.
He pointed to the 1697 Treaty of Rijswijk, in which Spain gave up sovereignty
over
Haiti and the
adjoining islands to France, and dismissed American possession of the island,
and
some 4,000 square
miles of seabed around it, as irrelevant under international law.
"La Navase is
Haitian and a part of Haiti," he said in an interview here. "If I own something
and I
make a decision
not to use it, that does not give you the right to come and claim it because
I have
not been using
it. How many islands off the coast of the United States are not inhabited?
Does that
mean anyone
can come and claim them too?"
Complicating
the situation even further, William Warren, a California businessman who
says he
wants to mine
Navassa for organic fertilizer, has also made an ownership claim. He has
filed suit
against Babbitt
and Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, citing a 1905 document in which
the
State Department
said it "possessed no territorial sovereignty" over the island.
For weeks now,
the Navassa imbroglio has filled news broadcasts and talk shows here. At
one
point last month,
the American ambassador, Timothy Carney, even suggested that since Haiti
has
many internal
problems that need attention, the country's energies might be better directed
toward
resolving those
issues, rather than focusing on a tiny island that few Haitians other than
fishermen
have ever visited.
Since Haiti is
the poorest nation in the Western Hemisphere and has been without a functioning
government for
the last 16 months, that observation, indelicate though it may have been,
seemed
self-evident.
Nevertheless, Haitians have taken umbrage at Carney's remarks and begun
to spin
extravagant
fantasies about his motives in pressing the American claim to the island.
Lafanmi Lavalas,
the political party organized by former President Jean-Bertrand Aristide,
immediately
condemned the American position and organized a protest late last month.
Haiti is also
awash with rumors
that the United States covets Navassa because the August expedition discovered
gold or uranium
there or even, according to one version making the rounds here, a gateway
to
Atlantis.
Those conjectures
are baseless, but "there is a great dollar dividend if we are talking biotechnology"
derived from
some of the spider and insect species unique to the island, said Ernst
Wilson, a Haitian
oceanographer
who has organized La Navase Island Defense Group to assert the Haitian
claim.
"La Navase is
a perfect laboratory, and biotechnological and pharmaceutical companies
are going to
want to get
into this because there is money there, I know it," he said.
Smith said that
in the interests of lowering the political temperature, he would be willing
to include
Haitian scientists
like Wilson on future visits to the island. His goal, he stressed, is to
assure that
Navassa remains
a pristine refuge for animal and plant species whose existence is endangered
elsewhere in
the Caribbean.
"Science should
be an activity that bridges diplomatic problems between countries," he
said. "As an
American organization,
we are subject to the Supreme Court ruling which says Navassa was
properly annexed.
But whoever ends up with jurisdiction over the island, we would like to
see them
manage it well."
Copyright 1998 The New York Times Company