U.S. officials see failed Haiti policy
By Ben Barber
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
U.S. officials, having washed their hands of this week's
Haitian election, say they recognize their policies in the
impoverished Caribbean nation have failed and they are
casting about for a new direction.
"The story of Haiti is we tried and we failed," said one U.S.
official, who spoke yesterday on the condition he not be identified.
"The problem with Haiti is they want us to fix it, and that's not the
way you get things fixed."
A State Department official, who also asked to remain
anonymous, said: "People are taking a hard look at our Haiti
policy and what comes next."
Haiti was hailed as a triumph for Clinton administration policy
after U.S. troops landed there in 1994 to oust a military
dictatorship and restore the rule of the elected president,
Jean-Bertrand Aristide.
But relations have deteriorated so much that the United
States did not even send observers for Sunday's election, in
which Mr. Aristide is expected to have won a new term in the
face of a low turnout and an opposition boycott.
The latest voting follows elections to the Haitian senate in
May that the United States says failed to meet standards of
fairness.
Congress told the administration not to channel any
foreign aid through the Haitian government until the State
Department could certify that the outcome of those elections
had been free and fair.
Mr. Aristide's Lavalas party won 16 of the 17 seats then,
but about half the winners were short of the votes needed to
avoid runoff elections, according to international election
observers. Nevertheless, the Aristide-dominated election
commission certified them as winners.
Ten more senate seats were up for grabs Sunday, and
when results are tallied later this week it is expected that Mr.
Aristide's party will be declared winners. Opposition leaders
who boycotted the polls say the balloting was unfair and that
few people voted.
State Department spokesman Richard Boucher said
yesterday that U.S. foreign aid would continue to flow
through private relief agencies — not through the Haitian
government — until the election process meets the standards
set by the U.S. Congress.
"We believe in democracy in this hemisphere, as do many
others in this hemisphere, and we're willing to work on it,"
Mr. Boucher said at a briefing yesterday.
"But the flaws that are there [in Haiti] need to be remedied
by the local authorities.
"And there are a lot of indications — including low voter
turnout, the violence that was in the pre-election period —
that show that they need reconciliation within Haitian society."
The U.S. official who spoke on condition of anonymity
said Haiti was effectively a prisoner of its own history of
underdevelopment and dictatorship.
"Nobody has anything good to say about improving
conditions in Haiti," he said. "Haiti is considered a failure. It's
not that our aid programs didn't work. There's a sort of
psychology at work that we were never able to crack.
"We poured a lot of money into it and never were able to
turn it around. [President] Clinton tried to help. [House
International Relations Committee Chairman Benjamin A.]
Gilman fought us every step of the way. But that's not why
they failed.
"There's no group of people willing to take charge and
work with the problems."
Mr. Boucher also expressed exasperation.
"There is always a limit. You can't impose democracy. . . .
"People on the ground in the country have to make the
choice, have to make the decisions and have to take the steps
necessary to make democracy grow," he said.
The Agency for International Development (AID) is
sending $85 million in humanitarian aid via private agencies to
Haiti in the current year, said an AID official. The money
supplies hundreds of thousands of people their only meal of
the day.
Mr. Boucher said U.S. aid programs aim to increase
incomes for the poor, slow environmental degradation,
improve economic and education performance and support
the provision of health and family planning services, including
HIV/AIDS and tuberculosis programs.