Failed boycott spotlights rift among exiles
BY ELAINE DE VALLE
Homeowners are still snapping up made-in-Mexico furniture.
Travel agencies have reported no significant numbers of Cancun-bound cancellations.
Corona beer continues to flow -- even at Cuban restaurants.
Many Cuban-Americans are not abstaining, despite a call by some Cuban exile
leaders for a
three-month boycott of Mexican products and travel to Mexico to protest
the ouster of 21 Cubans who
forced their way into the Mexican embassy in Havana earlier this month.
Even within the Cuban exile leadership, there is dissent. Several exile
leaders have come under fire
from traditional hard-liners on Spanish-language radio for taking a stance
against the boycott.
At least six organizations -- including the Cuban American National Foundation,
the Democracia
Movement and Brothers to the Rescue -- have broken with a much larger coalition
of groups that called
for a three-month boycott to protest the Mexican government's handling
of the embassy incident.
But the split highlights a widening chasm in the exile leadership over
issues near and dear to the
Cuban-American collective heart. And there are signs that there will be
more rebuttals to the traditional
Cuban party line.
''This is a crucial moment in the history of the exile,'' said Brothers
founder José Basulto. ``For the first
time, the image that some have wanted to create of an intolerant, radical
exile has been challenged.''
Those who disagree with the boycott cite two main reasons: One is that
engagement of the Mexican
government -- which is being courted to support a condemnation of Cuba's
human rights record -- will
help the exile cause more than retaliation. The other view is that the
incident was hatched by Fidel
Castro to ''embarrass'' Mexican President Vicente Fox and Foreign Minister
Jorge Castañeda for meeting
with a group of opposition leaders last month and to distract Miami as
the Cuban regime cracks down
on island dissidents.
''Castro knows our idiosyncrasies,'' said Democracia Movement founder and
leader Ramón Saúl
Sánchez. ``He has known us for 42 years and every time he plays
his music, we dance. Well, this time,
he can take his music and play it somewhere else.''
Janisset Rivero, co-founder of the Cuban Democratic Directorate -- which
also opposes the boycott --
thinks the expression of varied opinions is good.
''I don't see it as a tragic thing,'' Rivero said. ``I see it as an example
of what a plural community in a
free Cuba can be like.''
Basulto agrees and says the pluralism is something to be proud of.
''It is not division. It is a diversity of opinion,'' Basulto said. ``It's
good for people to know that we are
not represented by one single group or one single radio station or one
single radio personality.''
CHANGE IN ATTITUDE
Said Sánchez: ``The exile is producing a new attitude. Forty years
of doing the same thing that doesn't
work is enough to try new methods.''
Juan Carlos Espinosa, a political analyst and Cuba scholar, said the ''healthy''
difference of opinions
reflects a ''maturity'' of the exile community.
''This is sort of a post-Elián Cuban-American leadership that is
much more savvy to their image and
much more wary of manipulation by Cuban state security,'' Espinosa said.
``It's also a leadership that
is more reflective of the community.''
There are many within the community who are anti-Castro and anti-boycott.
Gabriel Mayor Jr., a salesman at Florida Builder Appliances, recently ordered
a Corona with lunch at La
Carreta, a Cuban restaurant, in Westchester. ''I cannot support the boycott
because the Mexican
consulate is a client of mine,'' he said.
Jack Guiteras, who owns a Coral Gables travel agency, has mixed feelings
about the boycott. ''My heart
is with it. But my head is with Basulto,'' he said.
Yet some boycott sponsors scoff at any dissent and insist that a majority
of the Cuban community backs
the effort. Alpha 66 President Andrés Nazario Sargén has
proposed organizing street caravans on
Saturdays ``to guarantee a firm position for the boycott.''
Anti-Castro activist Ninoska Pérez-Castellón has called the
anti-boycott exile leaders ''spokespeople for
the Mexican government'' on her daily 1 p.m. program on WQBA-AM (1140).
ALSO DIVISIVE
The boycott, however, is not the only issue that is causing deep divides
in the community. The Varela
Project -- an initiative by anti-Castro activists on the island who collected
10,000 signatures for a
plebiscite on the type of government in Cuba -- has also sparked a debate
in Miami. Many of the same
exile leaders who disagree with the boycott support the Varela Project.
However, many of the
boycotters do not give the effort any weight because they say it is done
within post-Castro Cuban law
and, therefore, legitimizes the regime.
There are also different camps on the Bush administration. Some exile leaders
have complained about
what they see as a lack of action on Cuba. Key among them: the continued
repatriation of Cuban
migrants caught at sea and the waiver of part of the Helms-Burton law that
allows U.S. lawsuits against
companies in Cuba that use property confiscated from Americans.
The other side -- mostly the boycott backers -- say wait and watch.
They point to the appointment of Otto Reich as assistant secretary of state
as well as other Cuban
Americans to key positions and a current review of Cuba policy as signs
that Bush espouses la causa.
But Joe Garcia, executive director of the Cuban American National Foundation,
said the administration
needs to see the Cuban community as part of the solution -- not the problem.
`THE BIG PICTURE'
''What the foundation is trying to do is make the exile community relevant
in the big picture,'' Garcia
said, noting that Cuban Americans do not represent a large market for Mexican
products or travel.
``What relevance is there in a boycott of a product that you don't use?
We are pushing the concept of
trying to develop a policy that sets the Cuban community as a relevant
factor, not as some cheering
section sitting in the stands.''