How a Cuban Spy Sowed Confusion in the Pentagon
By Mary Anastasia O'Grady*, Editor
Ana Belen Montes could have gotten the death penalty. Instead the former
U.S.
Defense Intelligence Agency analyst who spied for Cuba got a 25 years sentence
two weeks ago. The lenience was part of a plea whereby she agreed to tell
the
Justice Department about her espionage since 1985.
Justice has so far declined to publicize what Ms. Montes told interrogators.
Fair
enough. After all, U.S. intelligence would certainly not want Cuba and
its allies in
the Middle East to know what Ms. Montes revealed about her work on behalf
of the
communist regime.
Nonetheless, it is reasonable for Americans, now living under serious threats
of
aggressive terrorism, to wonder how much damage Ms. Montes did to homeland
security. One reason she was picked up on Sept. 21, 2001 was because in
her
position at the Pentagon she had access to highly classified intelligence
not
limited to Cuba. Normally, a discovered spy might be left in place for
months and
tailed in order to uncover more information about her contacts and modus
operandi.
But Ms. Montes was quickly arrested after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks
for fear
that she might further compromise U.S. security.
Aside from her ability to tell Cuba secrets that might be passed along
to terrorists,
there was another risk posed by Ms. Montes' penetration of the DIA. In
her role as
the key Pentagon intelligence analyst on Cuba, Ms. Montes could influence
the
National Intelligence Council and thereby put her stamp on consolidated
NIC
reports. Those reports combine the findings of separate agencies but Ms.
Montes
could have overshadowed other analysts if her views were more highly valued
by
the higher-ups who consolidate the information.
In fact, Ms. Montes held considerable sway over the Pentagon's opinion
of Cuba. In
1998 the Defense Department released a high-profile report claiming that
Cuba
posed no military threat to the U.S. It discounted risks that Cuba was
developing
chemical and biological weaponry. Ms. Montes was the key drafter of that
report,
which means not only that it is pretty much useless to U.S. intelligence
but that it
may have contained disinformation damaging to U.S. security interests.
Ms. Montes is the 45-year-old daughter of Puerto Rican parents and was
born on a
U.S. military base in Germany. In 1979 she earned a degree in foreign affairs
from
the University of Virginia and in 1988 she finished a master's degree at
Johns
Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies. In 1985 she
began
working as a junior analyst at the DIA, focusing on Nicaragua. She became
a Cuba
analyst in 1992 but reportedly worked for Cuba as far back as 1985.
According to an affidavit filed by FBI Special Agent Stephen McCoy and
posted on
the Justice Department Web site, "during the course of her employment,
Ms.
Montes has had direct and authorized access to classified information relating
to
national defense." He also says that she "was a clandestine CuIS [Cuban
Intelligence Service] agent who communicated with her CuIS handling officer"
through encrypted messages on short wave radio.
Ms. Montes blew the cover of four U.S. agents working in Cuba and she shared
numerous classified documents with Cuban intelligence. But it is her role
in
declaring Cuba harmless to the U.S. national security that may have had
the
biggest yet unappreciated effect.
Not surprisingly, the 1998 report grabbed big headlines in the U.S. Anti-embargo
types used it to back their agenda for making nice with Fidel. Journalists
and
academics soft on totalitarian Cuba were longing for a more accommodating
posture toward the regime, and so was Castro. Evidence from the Pentagon
that no
Cuban threat existed seemed to boost the chances for engagement with the
dictator. "The Pentagon has concluded that Cuba poses no significant threat
to
U.S. national security and senior defense officials increasingly favor
engaging their
counterparts to reduce existing tensions," said Knight Ridder News Service.
William Cohen, then secretary of defense, did in fact have reservations
about the
report but pro-Cuban elements complained that he was merely responding
to
political pressure from Cuban-Americans. The Knight Ridder report referring
to
Cuban exile politics said, "That's why [Mr.] Cohen held off presenting
the DIA report
on Capitol Hill, which had been scheduled for Tuesday."
As it turns out, Mr. Cohen was only exercising good judgment and common
sense,
perhaps even with input from other analysts who understood Castro and had
far
different opinions from those of Ms. Montes.
Yet, Ms. Montes had done her job well. Top U.S. military brass enthusiastically
embraced the report. Marine General Charles Wilhelm, then head of U.S.
Southern
Command, was quoted in the Miami Herald saying that the Cuban military
"has no
capability whatsoever to project itself beyond the borders of Cuba, so
its really not
a threat to anyone around it." In a long-winded op-ed piece in the Palm
Beach Post
in 1998, retired Marine Gen. Jack Sheehan told of a trip to Cuba where
he shared
rum and cigars with Fidel. He argued that the U.S. needed a kinder, gentler
attitude
toward the regime. "Our intelligence data also supported the conclusion
that Cuba
was not a military threat to the U.S.," Mr. Sheehan wrote.
It is logical to suspect that one of Ms. Montes" jobs may have been to
discredit
defectors from Cuban intelligence who were telling stories of a less-than
amicable
Cuban agenda. Since then, State Department analysts have reported that
Cuba
has at least some bioweapons technology and has expressed concern that
Cuba
could share the science with rogue states. Iraq, Iran, Syria and Libya
come to
mind.
The claims that Cuba is no threat to the U.S. may have seemed believable
in the
sense that, for what it's worth, Cuba is in no position to mount a military
attack on
the U.S. But that is a long way from saying that Castro is a benign presence
or is
incapable of doing harm to the U.S. through indirect means. That's why
it is
important to know to what extent information Ms. Montes shared with Cuba
may
have made its way to other U.S. enemies.
ABOUT THE EDITOR
*Mary Anastasia O'Grady is editor of The Americas, which appears every
Friday.
The column discusses political, economic, business and financial events
and
trends in the Americas. Ms. O'Grady is also a senior editorial-page writer
for the
Journal, writing on Latin America and Canada. She joined the paper in 1995
and
was named a senior editorial-page writer in 1999.
Prior to working at the Journal, Ms. O'Grady worked as an options strategist
first
for Advest Inc. in 1981 and later for Thomson McKinnon Securities in 1983.
She
moved to Merrill Lynch & Co. in 1984 as an options strategist.
In 1997, Ms. O'Grady won the Inter American Press Association's Daily Gleaner
Award for editorial commentary, and in 1999 she received an honorable mention
in
IAPA's opinion award category for her editorials and weekly column. Born
in Bryn
Mawr, Pa., she received a bachelor's degree in English from Assumption
College in
Worcester, Mass. She has an M.B.A. in financial management from Pace
University in New York.
Ms. O'Grady invites comments to mary.o'grady@wsj.com1