Approximately 60 percent of Americans nationwide feel Elian Gonzalez
should
be reunited with his Cuban father, a position that surely disappoints
exiles in Miami.
Yet here in South Florida, a Herald/NBC 6 poll found that 76 percent
of white
non-Hispanics, and 92 percent of black non-Hispanics, express
that sentiment.
The gap indicates the presence of a dynamic here that leads those
who live
closest to Cuban Americans to be even less sympathetic
toward their cause.
Is this statistical evidence of anti-Cuban hostility in our community,
and, if so,
why?
With such a large Cuban presence in South Florida -- on the order
of 800,000 --
non-Cubans here should be more familiar with the oppressive conditions
inside
Cuba than Americans elsewhere.
In our midst are people who have been held in Fidel Castro's prisons
for daring to
demand freedoms we take for granted.
The private aircraft shot down by Castro's military jets over
international waters
four years ago took off from a South Florida airport. Four South
Florida residents,
including three U.S. citizens, were killed.
Many of the 14,000 Pedro Pan children sent alone to this country
by their parents
to escape Castro's indoctrination camps four decades ago have
settled here.
With so much direct exposure to the Cuban experience, one would
expect
non-Cuban South Floridians to be more hesitant than other Americans
about
sending Elian back to Cuba. Yet the opposite is true.
It seems likely that some non-Cubans here who say they want Elian
returned do
so just to spite a community they don't like.
It would be easy for Cubans to cite the poll as a simple matter
of racism -- as a
couple of readers did this week in e-mail messages they sent
me. That, of
course, would justify Cubans responding in kind, by displaying
increased
contempt for non-Cubans. We would then be locked in a destructive
spiral of
worsening interethnic hostility that would not bode well for
our future.
A better alternative would be to use the poll as a wake-up call.
Racial animosity never occurs in a vacuum -- there is always a
history behind it.
At the risk of oversimplification, our history is this: Non-Cubans
resent the
powerful economic, social and political machine that Cubans built
here -- one that
virtually excludes them. Cubans, justifiably proud of their achievement,
feel little
obligation to invite others to the party.
Elian Gonzalez's plight has upset the local detente. Cubans find
themselves
appealing for solidarity from people they have largely ignored.
Non-Cubans,
bombarded by the passions of a community they resent, have turned
a cold
shoulder to exile appeals.
Earlier in their exodus to Florida, Cubans had a golden opportunity
to win the
empathy of their new neighbors. After all, Americans -- black
Americans in
particular -- tend to side with the oppressed.
But the exiles never really tried to win over their non-Cuban
neighbors -- possibly
because they believed their visit was only temporary, expecting
Castro would
soon fall.
It's still possible for Cuban and non-Cuban South Floridians to
establish genuine
solidarity -- but it won't be easy, since the roles of the players
have changed.
Cubans now are the dominant cultural force in Miami-Dade County.
It is up to
them to decide that there is something to gain from better relations
with
non-Cubans, and then reach out to them.
Non-Cubans must then be willing to accept the olive branches,
if and when they
are offered.
Or we could continue on as we have -- as ethnic communities living
in the same
town, yet on different planets.
Copyright 2000 Miami Herald