BY FRANCES ROBLES AND JACK WHEAT
Unable to believe the little boy they claimed for their own and
kept for five months
is happy with his father, Elian Gonzalez's Miami relatives charged
Sunday that a
photograph released Saturday of a smiling Elian reunited with
his Cuban family is a fake.
''The picture -- that is not Elian,'' said his cousin Marisleysis
Gonzalez at a Washington,
D.C., press conference.
But the Rev. Joan Brown Campbell of the National Council of Churches
vouched
for the picture's authenticity on ABC's This Week Sunday morning.
And a Herald
examination of the photo found no signs of fakery.
Photos of Elian with his father, Juan Miguel Gonzalez, his stepmother
and baby
brother, were released Saturday by the father's attorney, Gregory
Craig. The
Miami family focused on one that shows the four family members
together. A
smiling Elian has his arm around his father.
Marisleysis Gonzalez said the proof the photo is phony is Elian's hairline.
Elian's hair in the reunion photo is longer than his hair in a
photo taken by The
Associated Press during the raid in which federal agents removed
the boy from
Little Havana earlier that day, Marisleysis said.
SHIRT QUESTIONED
Marisleysis also said that in the reunion photo, Elian was wearing
a different shirt
from the one he was wearing when he left the Gonzalez home in
Little Havana.
However, the Immigration and Naturalization Service said Saturday
that agents
provided Elian with a change of clothes. And Campbell, a supporter
of Juan Miguel,
told ABC that she was with the father and son after their reunion,
and saw that he
was wearing the shirt he had on in the photo.
Bill Andrews, electronic imaging editor for The Herald, analyzed
the reunion photo
for authenticity Saturday before it was accepted for publication
in Sunday's editions.
It appears completely legitimate, he said.
CHEAP CAMERA
The signs point not to fraud, but a cheap camera -- probably a
disposable camera
-- with plastic lens, he said.
Andrews attributed the changing appearance of Elian's head to
differences in
cameras and photographic conditions.
The most widely published photo of the raid, Associated Press
photographer
Alan Diaz's image of armed federal agents preparing to take Elian
from a defender
inside a closet, showed the hair on the side of Elian's head
cut close to the scalp.
''The picture in the closet was real sharp, taken by a professional
camera. You
could see every hair in detail,'' Andrews said.
In the reunion photo from Andrews Air Force Base, Elian seems
to have more
dark hair. But in fact, the analysis of the photo showed that
the sides of Elian's
head are simply darker, probably due to the combination of how
the flash
illuminated the scene and plastic lens that blurred details,
Andrews said.
Several clues argued that the reunion photo is for real, Andrews
said. ''The first
thing I noticed was the red-eye you get from home pictures you
take with a cheap
camera. It was consistent among Juan, Elian and the baby.''
Next was the pattern of shadows. In the photo of a smiling Elian
hugging his
father, the shadow from the electronic flash is the same around
the heads of
Elian, his father and his brother, Andrews said.
Andrews also could find no technical signs of computer-morphed
photographs,
such as a hair cutting off when it should continue, or the same
hairs being
repeated several times to cover up the seam where two images
were joined
together.
Copyright 2000 Miami Herald