BY FRANK DAVIES
WASHINGTON -- Vice President Al Gore's break with the administration
in the Elian Gonzalez case may undercut the Immigration and Naturalization
Services delicate negotiations over the boy's fate, a former
top INS official
said Friday.
But congressional supporters of a permanent residency bill designed
to take
the boys case out of the hands of the INS conceded that even
with Gore's
support the measure still faces major hurdles on Capitol Hill.
``The votes arent there yet,'' conceded Sen. Bob Smith, the New
Hampshire
Republican who introduced the bill this week with the support
of Floridas two
senators, Democrat Bob Graham and Republican Connie Mack.
ANOTHER VIEW
And they may never be, although Graham was more hopeful: ``The
vice presidents
support will be very helpful, not only with Democrats but it
will take the
partisanship out of this issue.''
The more immediate effect of Gores stance could be on the continuing
talks in
Miami between government officials and lawyers for the boys Miami
relatives.
INS lawyers trying to persuade the family to accept the inevitability
of giving up
Elian have just lost important leverage, said Jan Ting, former
assistant INS
commissioner for refugees and asylum.
``INS people are professionals who know politics underlies everything,''
said Ting,
a Temple University immigration law professor. ``But this [Gores
position] really
takes away some important support at a critical moment.''
He added, ``Many in the INS have felt this case has dragged on
too long, and its
very demoralizing.''
Rita Simon, an American University law professor who closely follows
the INS and
immigration issues, had a similar perspective: ``Its one thing
for the INS when
federal courts weigh in, they expect that -- but when presidential
candidates get
involved, including from the administration, it makes the negotiations
very difficult.''
`JAWS WERE DROPPING'
One INS employee, who requested anonymity, said news of Gores
position on
Thursday spread rapidly at INS headquarters, ``and jaws were
dropping; it was
quite a blow.''
But Maria Cardona, INS spokeswoman, said talks would resume Monday
with the
relatives lawyers, and Gores position ``would not affect things.''
The timing of Gores announcement caused some discomfort Friday
at the White
House, and prompted disagreement from the Democratic leader of
the Senate,
Tom Daschle.
President Clinton opposes the latest version of the ``Elian bill,''
spokesman Jake
Siewert said, but he would not say whether Clinton would veto
the bill should it
pass.
``There is a lot of opposition to that bill in Congress. They
[similar bills] have been
kicking around up there for a couple of months and we haven't
seen any action on
it,'' Siewert said.
The bill would confer permanent residency status on Elian, his
father and five
other family members living in Cuba. It doesnt go as far as citizenship
-- a
measure offered by Mack that has languished since January.
BILL IS PROTESTED
But the father, Juan Miguel Gonzalez, is seeking a visa to come
to the United
States to claim his son, and in a letter sent to Lott and Daschle,
he protested the
residency bill.
``We frankly are surprised that someone could undertake this initiative
without
consent and without even consulting our opinion,'' said the letter.
``We are not in
agreement and we hope the United States Senate does not approve
it.''
The letter was reprinted Friday in the Cuban Communist Party newspaper,
Granma.
Daschle said Friday that he disagreed with Gore on the issue:
``I think
reunification with the father is paramount, and the sooner the
better.'' Later,
speaking about political posturing he has seen during the months-long
controversy, Daschle called it ``as despicable a situation as
Ive seen in a long,
long time.''
Even with Gores support, the Elian bill faces long odds in Congress.
Stalwart
conservatives such as Reps. Steve Largent of Oklahoma and Mark
Sanford of
South Carolina said they favored returning the boy to his father
because it fit their
family-values agenda.
Copyright 2000 Miami Herald