BY TERRY JACKSON
Univision's broadcast of a Gonzalez family video that shows Elian
telling his father
he doesn't want to return to Cuba has ignited charges that the
network acted
improperly in how it handled the tape and wrongly tried to brand
it as an ``exclusive.''
The decision to air the tape also is controversial because it
revives a longstanding
TV news ethics debate: Should stations or networks use a tape
when they don't
know the circumstances under which it was made?
An executive at Telemundo, Univision's chief Spanish-language
rival, said
Thursday Univision violated an agreement with representatives
for Lazaro
Gonzalez. Joe Peyronnin, Telemundo's executive vice president
for news, said the
Gonzalez family gave Univision the tape with the understanding
the network would
copy it and freely distribute it to other news organizations.
Such practices, called
pools, are common within the industry.
``They were supposed to give it to everybody,'' Peyronnin said.
``Instead they
exploited it for their own purposes.''
A Univision spokesman refused to discuss the issue Thursday, but
news
directors at several English-language stations confirmed Peyronnin's
version of
events.
VIDEO WITHHELD
According to Peyronnin and others, the Gonzalez family gave the
home video to a
Univision reporter at about 1:30 a.m. Thursday, shortly after
it was made. But
when WSVN-Fox 7, which kept its news show on the air until 3
a.m., asked for a
copy, Univision refused, saying it would not release copies until
the footage first
aired on its 6 a.m. newscast.
When Univision finally handed out copies to the English-language
stations after 7
a.m., the Elian tape now had a Univision logo superimposed in
the upper
right-hand corner -- branding the tape as an exclusive.
Peyronnin said Telemundo contacted the Gonzalez family, learned
of the pool
arrangement, and demanded from Univision a ``clean'' copy of
the Elian tape,
minus the network logo. After first refusing, Univision complied
at about 10 a.m.,
Peyronnin said.
``I think that they acted inappropriately,'' he said. ``A major
network news
organization doesn't do that sort of thing.''
ETHICAL DEBATE
No matter how the tape was handled, its use by news organizations
raises ethical
issues.
A general rule of television news is that organizations avoid
using video if they
didn't produce it or don't know the circumstances under which
it was produced.
CBS' 60 Minutes ran into heavy criticism on Nov. 22, 1998, when
the show ran
video provided by Dr. Jack Kevorkian showing a man suffering
from Lou Gehrig's
Disease dying as Kevorkian injected him with a lethal drug.
Aside from the propriety of depicting a man's death, at issue
was whether
Kevorkian's video might have left out key details that would
have put the incident
in a different context.
The Elian video, aside from the propriety of filming a 6-year-old,
raises issues of
whether Elian was coached and the circumstances under which his
statements
were made.
``If one does decide to use a tape like this, you have to be very
clear to the viewer
that it was hand-out,'' said Peyronnin, whose network did air
the tape.
``Clearly this is being handed out to influence people.''
Copyright 2000 Miami Herald