By ANDRES OPPENHEIMER
Herald Staff Writer
Only two weeks after much of Europe adopted a common currency, some Latin
American countries are debating a bold idea -- dropping their national
currencies
in favor of the U.S. dollar.
Few are predicting that countries in the region will soon make bonfires
out of
domestic currency notes bearing images of their national heroes, but growing
numbers of economists say it's only a matter of time before they act.
As of now, only Panama has a fully dollarized economy, and Argentina has
pegged
the peso to the dollar, effectively using both currencies interchangeably.
A boisterous debate on the issue has begun in several countries. It was
sparked by
Argentine President Carlos Menem's request to his finance minister last
week to
look into the convenience of a full-fledged ``dollarization,'' coupled
with a
regionwide exhaustion over the attacks on local currencies by global speculators.
On Monday, Eduardo Bours Castelo, president of Mexico's Business
Coordinating Council, the country's largest private-sector umbrella organization,
called on Mexicans to leave aside outdated definitions of nationalism and
move
toward a ``hard currency'' -- most likely the U.S. dollar.
Mexico is one of the countries where ``dollarization'' is most hotly debated,
because its economy is already tied to that of the United States under
the North
American Free Trade Agreement. Mexico does more than 80 percent of its
trade
with the United States, and gets millions a year in dollar remittances
from
Mexicans in the United States.
``We have studied how to better protect our inflation levels, interest
rates and
influx or outflows of capital every time there is an international financial
crisis, and
we have come to the conclusion that the best way would be creating a monetary
union with the United States and Canada,'' Bours said in a telephone interview.
``Whenever there is an international crisis, there is a massive flight
to quality
[currencies],'' Bours said. ``If we had a hard currency, we would be part
of the
quality.''
Bours' statements came a day after former Argentine Economy Minister Domingo
Cavallo, the architect of Argentina's one-peso-to-the-dollar fixed exchange
rate,
was quoted by El Nuevo Herald as saying that ``there is no doubt in my
mind that
Mexico would gain a lot by adopting a dual monetary system, such as Argentina,
or a complete dollarization of its economy.''
And days earlier, Nobel Prize-winning economist Gary Becker had made the
same suggestion in a speech in Mexico, cautioning that such a goal should
be
achieved over several years.
Mexico's finance ministry officials have dismissed the idea, citing monetary
sovereignty concerns, but central bank authorities are believed to be warmer
to it.
Mexican bankers and other private-sector leaders who back the project say
it will
be much easier to advance after 2000, when a new president will take office
with
greater political capital to spend on such ambitious proposals.
Supporters of ``dollarization'' argue that by adopting the U.S. currency,
countries
could not only prevent the recurrent attacks from global speculators --
who
withdraw their funds from all emerging markets at the slightest sign of
economic
trouble -- but would also reduce interest rates and stimulate foreign investment.
Currently, most countries with weak currencies are forced to raise interest
rates to
capture foreign money and make up for capital flight. The trouble is that
high
interest rates slow the economy, they say. In addition, by eliminating
currency
speculation, corporations can make long-term plans and are more likely
to invest,
supporters say.
But, leaving aside the political perils of proposing a conversion to the
U.S. dollar in
Mexico, some economists say it would hurt the country's economy.
Rogelio Ramirez de la O, president of Mexico's Ecanal economic research
firm,
says his studies show that pegging the local currency to the dollar works
in
countries that rely heavily on commodity exports, such as Argentina, but
would not
necessarily help countries that depend on manufacturing exports, such as
Mexico.
This is because Mexican exports of computer parts or cars have large built-in
costs, such as wages and electricity. If Mexico were to pay its workers
in dollars,
production costs would go up immediately, yet the price of the final product
would
remain the same. ``It would strangle the economy,'' Ramirez de la O says.
Brazil's decision Monday to allow a free float of the U.S. dollar is in
step with
what Mexico did four years ago and what Far East countries did last year,
Ramirez de la O said.
``In the long run, we will move in that direction,'' he said, referring
to the U.S.
dollar. ``But we are talking about 10 years from now or so. Before we do
that, we
would have to adjust our salaries and other domestic costs to U.S. levels.''
But others counter that Europe's recent introduction of the euro will accelerate
the
trend.
``The whole thing is inevitable,'' says Antonio Villamil, a former undersecretary
of
commerce with the Bush administration, who has just been appointed Florida's
trade secretary. ``As you proceed with economic integration, you will have
three
major currencies: the yen, the dollar and the euro. Whoever operates outside
these
currencies will incur significant costs.''
Copyright © 1999 The Miami Herald