Our Yankee Notion
U. S. (la Belle Sauvage). "Bon voyage! au revoir! Count
Ferdinand de Lesseps.
Don't go home with the impression THAT I DON'T RULE OVER HERE."
Artist: Thomas Nast
This Thomas Nast cartoon emphatically declares that any interoceanic
canal built in Central America or Mexico must be administered by the
American government, not the European powers. It rejects the plan
of
French diplomat Ferdinand de Lesseps to construct such a canal in Panama,
and reflects the view expressed by President Rutherford B. Hayes in his
recent special message to the U.S. Senate of March 8, 1880.
De Lesseps was world-renowned for directing the construction of the Suez
Canal in Egypt (1859-1869), and he was eager to replicate that feat in
the
western hemisphere. In May 1879, delegates from 22 nations (including
the
United States) met in Paris at the International Congress for the Study
of an
Interoceanic Canal. Proposals were presented for canals across Panama,
the
southern border of Nicaragua, and the Isthmus of Tehuantepec in southern
Mexico. It was, however, De Lesseps's plan for a Panama canal which
won
the backing of the majority of delegates. (Only 19 of the 136 delegates
were
engineers, and only one had actually visited Central America.)
In December 1879, the determined De Lesseps embarked on a trip to the
proposed site in Panama, before journeying to the United States.
The Hayes
administration would have been leery about any European enterprise in
Central America, but was particularly uneasy after French involvement,
given
the failed attempt by (now-deposed) Napoleon III to install a puppet ruler
in
Mexico in the 1860s. In his annual message to Congress in December
1879,
President Hayes warned that an interoceanic canal must be "under the
protective auspices of the United States." On January 9, 1880, he
ordered
two American naval ships to dock near the possible sites, and requested
$200,000 from Congress to establish coaling stations in the area.
On February 10, 1880, Hayes informed his cabinet that he intended to send
a
special message to the Senate on the issue, which he believed threatened
the
prosperity and, especially, the security of the United States. The
cabinet
strongly endorsed his stance, but the president's secretary, William Rogers,
had to work on gaining press support, particularly from Harper's Weekly.
In
the newspaper's February 28 edition (on newsstands February 18), George
William Curtis disputed the assumption that De Lesseps's plan threatened
the
vital interests of the United States or violated the Monroe Doctrine.
The
editor pointed out that it was a private enterprise, not backed by the
French
or any other foreign government, to which Americans could invest and buy
shares.
Rogers contacted Curtis on February 23 to urge him to support the
administration's policy. The secretary explained the president's
position and
stressed how important press opinion was on the issue. In the March
13
issue (available March 3), Curtis artfully straddled the question.
He first
summarized the arguments of both De Lesseps and his political opponents,
then stated that while construction of an interoceanic canal by a Frenchman
or
French company was not itself a threat, it did raise the possibility of
trouble.
Therefore, a clear statement by the American government was justified so
that
all parties knew what was and was not permissible.
In New York City, De Lesseps assured Americans that not only was his a
private venture which desired American investors, but that he would consider
locating its headquarters in the United States. On March 8, as De
Lesseps
was testifying before a committee of the U.S. House of Representatives,
Hayes issued his special message to the Senate in which the president stated
unequivocally the administration's position: "The policy of this
country is a
canal under American control."
Whether or not De Lesseps had read Curtis's second editorial, which
contended that the project's director and all interested parties would
welcome
an explicit administration statement, he acted in accordance with it.
De
Lesseps hailed the president's message as good news for his project, then
went on a round-trip speaking tour across the country. Meanwhile,
the
French government promptly sent their American minister to reassure Hayes
that they had no direct or indirect involvement in the project.
To win public approval and give the impression of U.S. government support,
De Lesseps established an American advisory committee and offered the
chairmanship to Ulysses S. Grant, who had advocated construction of an
interoceanic canal while president. After Grant's rejection, De Lesseps
turned
to Navy Secretary Richard Thompson, who in December 1880 accepted the
$25,000 salary, while intending to remain at his administration post (paying
$8,000). An angry and appalled President Hayes, who had just reiterated
his
firm position on the canal in his final annual message to Congress, fired
Thompson.
Although Hayes did not stop the project, the issue of the proposed
interoceanic canal prompted the president to expand his vision in foreign
policy. After it arose, he called on Congress to subsidize steamship
lines to
Latin America, Asia, and Australia; to subsidize a telegraph cable from
California to Hawaii, then to Asia and Australia; and to increase the number
of ships in the tiny American navy, which would sail in every region of
the
globe.
De Lesseps's company began excavation for the Panama canal in 1881, but
was plagued with problems and went bankrupt in 1889. An investigation
by
the French government into the company's operations resulted in five-year
prison sentences for De Lesseps and his son, Charles, but an appeals court
reversed the decision. In 1903, the Hay-Bunau-Varilla Treaty gave
the
United States sole rights to construct and operate a canal in Panama.
The
next year, De Lesseps's former company, which had reorganized in 1894,
sold its holdings to the United States. The Panama Canal was officially
opened in 1914. In 1977, President Jimmy Carter signed the Panama
Canal
Treaty which returned ownership to the Republic of Panama in 2000.
In Nast's first cartoon on the subject of an interoceanic canal (the cover
of
March 13), the artist presents the "European Plan" as a collusion between
the
British and the French. In this featured cartoon (Nast's second),
the focus is
now on De Lesseps the Frenchman, while the British symbol, John Bull, has
literally taken a backseat (and the German Kaiser's helmet is barely
noticeable). Miss Columbia is presented as a noble savage, and De
Lesseps
efforts to win over Americans is mocked as a bowl of French candy.
Robert C. Kennedy